News:



  • May 14, 2024, 10:36:18 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Airfoil thickness  (Read 2320 times)

Offline John Watson

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 97
Airfoil thickness
« on: December 08, 2017, 10:16:51 AM »
I note that some wings have a thick airfoil while others have thin airfoils . Is there an advantage one or the other? Also to address the width of the wing , tapered or straight?

Offline David_Stack

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 123
Re: Airfoil thickness
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2017, 01:18:56 PM »
John;

  I think you are best served performing a search of the "Stunt Design" sub-forum.  These topics and a host of others (e.g. stabilizer/elevator thickness relative to wing thickness) have been discussed therein.

r/
Dave

Offline John Watson

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 97
Re: Airfoil thickness
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2017, 02:05:36 PM »
Thanks

Offline Target

  • C/L Addict
  • 2019 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1692
Re: Airfoil thickness
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2017, 03:23:49 PM »
Subscribing.
Regards,
Chris
AMA 5956

Offline Scott Richlen

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2083
Re: Airfoil thickness
« Reply #4 on: December 25, 2017, 06:14:11 AM »
Here's the results of my search:

Quote
(Sorry, no matches were found)

Search Engine out of tune?

Offline Paul Smith

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 5803
Re: Airfoil thickness
« Reply #5 on: December 25, 2017, 08:06:20 AM »
Thicker airfoils produce more lift & drag than thin airfoils.  Since stunters want to go slow & turn tight, a really fat airfoil is good.

Speed, racing, and carrier just want to go fast & don't need to turn, so thin is good.

Combat is a compromise between speed & turning.
Paul Smith

Online Jim Hoffman

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 570
Re: Airfoil thickness
« Reply #6 on: December 25, 2017, 09:00:17 AM »
Not a simple question

The thicker airfoil produces added drag that requires LOTS of extra power.  Further, all else being the same, wake turbulence is also higher in a thicker airfoil.

Like ALL things it is a compromise.  If you can build light, a thinner airfoil has some benefits.

A thicker airfoil is more forgiving to weight, but the power needs are greater

There are other elements also including aspect ratio and LE radius.

Jim Hoffman

Offline Istvan Travnik

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 289
Re: Airfoil thickness
« Reply #7 on: December 26, 2017, 06:09:52 PM »
Keep in mind that the flap is PART of the airfoil, (moving part).
When you count thickness in % , you MUST count the fixed part + flap together.
Finally the achievable Cy (lift coefficient) depends not only on the thickness, but the camber appeared by deflected flap, the attack angle (alpha), radius of leading edge and several others...
Cx (drag coefficient) depends mostly on the thickness.

The turning ability of model is another question...

Offline Air Ministry .

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 5009
Re: Airfoil thickness
« Reply #8 on: December 26, 2017, 08:15:38 PM »
Yes .


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here