News:



  • May 05, 2024, 03:33:32 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Sig Primary Force  (Read 4571 times)

Offline Gordon Tarbell

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 516
Sig Primary Force
« on: August 03, 2007, 08:16:16 PM »
I seem to remember seeing in an earlier post that the Primary Force tends to be tail heavy and benefits from using a little heavier engine. Any one try a Saito FA30S?
Gordon Tarbell AMA 15019

Offline Dennis Moritz

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2464
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2007, 01:29:50 PM »
I've used FP40s and an FP35 with a tongue, also. No CG problem.

Offline Steve Holt

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 197
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2007, 04:24:58 PM »
I believe the comments about the ARF Primary Force building tail heavy were relative to use of the FP25 that Mikey had on his original or an LA25.  Engines at about 8.5 oz seem to balance about right, although mine required the stock muffler on an OS 25FSR to balance properly.  Mine is, however, flown without the spinner.  It seems the design gods made the cargo area in my RX400h just long enough to fit the airplane without the spinner.  Wing T/E is against wheel wells and the rudder is almost touching the back of the seat.  With a spinner, the read door hits the spinner when it closes.
Steve

Alan Hahn

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #3 on: August 05, 2007, 07:38:12 PM »
I am using a Saito 40 and the balance seems fine to me. Your 30 is a little lighter, so I don't think you will have any issues.

Offline Gordon Tarbell

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 516
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #4 on: August 05, 2007, 10:36:52 PM »
I am saving the Saito 40 for a little bigger plane so I figure the 30 could use a workout.
Gordon Tarbell AMA 15019

Offline Bootlegger

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2710
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #5 on: August 13, 2007, 06:41:11 PM »

   Fellows, are you using the recommened c/g location ?  Ie 2" back from thre l/e at the fuse ??  My P force kit seems to be real nose heavy using an OS 32 SX with stock muffler, 1oz nose weight and an APC prop.
   It took all this to get the c/g where the plans called for it..
   Any suggestions will be appreciated...
8th Air Force Veteran
Gil Causey
AMA# 6964

Offline MikeyPratt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 748
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2007, 09:27:52 AM »
   Fellows, are you using the recommened c/g location ?  Ie 2" back from thre l/e at the fuse ??  My P force kit seems to be real nose heavy using an OS 32 SX with stock muffler, 1oz nose weight and an APC prop.
   It took all this to get the c/g where the plans called for it..
   Any suggestions will be appreciated...

The CG must be set at 2" back from the leading edge at the fuselage.  Pitch the stock muffler and use a tongue muffler this should bring the CG closer.  Further fine adjustments can be made to the CG by selecting different weight spinners, props, tailwheels, or Prather nose weights.

A mass produced model has to have an acceptable range of weight for the components.  Some might receive a stab that weighs slightly less or more that another.  This is the way it is.  To make a statement that they all come out tail heavy just isn't true because there are so many different engines available out there that it becomes almost imposable to have the perfect weight on all the components. mw~

Later,
Mikey



Willis Swindell

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #7 on: August 26, 2007, 06:06:10 AM »
Our local Hobby Shop is going out of business and I picked up a Primary Force on an offer I could not refuse.  I plan to use a Brodak 25 has any one tried that engine on a PF? I know the engine is about the lightest  25  around. I think I  can use ,012 lines on a 25.
Willis y1 ???

Willis Swindell

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #8 on: September 18, 2007, 04:51:42 PM »
Finished my new Primary Force. Brodak 25 9x5 prop 3 oz tank weighs 38 oz The only thing that worries me is I used a taller control horn and the swivel that you mount the push rod to
 on the bell crank seems to be in a slight bind because of the raised angle of the push rod.
Willis

Offline MikeyPratt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 748
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #9 on: September 20, 2007, 10:12:20 AM »
Finished my new Primary Force. Brodak 25 9x5 prop 3 oz tank weighs 38 oz The only thing that worries me is I used a taller control horn and the swivel that you mount the push rod to
 on the bell crank seems to be in a slight bind because of the raised angle of the push rod.
Willis

Hi Willis,
Make sure that there are no binds within the control system "at all" before your first test flight.  Binds in the control system will cause the model to hunt in level flight and it won't grove.  Where does the P-Force balance with your B-25??

Later,
Mikey

Offline Andrew Hathaway

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 805
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #10 on: September 20, 2007, 12:25:38 PM »
I'm pretty impressed with the Primary Force.  I'm running a ball bearing OS 25F on pipe.  I didn't use the kit wheels or wheel pants cause I fly off grass and the balance is somewhere between 2-3" from the leading edge.  The engine weighs about 8oz, and I used a fairly heavy Great Planes aluminum spinner.  The weight of the header and pipe is pretty negligable.  Even with a CG further back then recommended it really flies well.  Using the same engine with pipe on several other planes resulted in the same tail heavy condition, so I can't blame the design or the kit.

I didn't use any of the kit hardware package.  I sleeved the pushrod with carbon fibre tube, and used a Rocket City 4-40 ball link.  The kit control horn was warped out of the box, so I substituted a Dubro horn.  The CA hinges didn't sit right with me, so I opened up the slots with a cutoff disk in the Dremel and used Dubro pinned hinges.  The supplied 4oz tank only holds about 3.75oz and is really too flexible to be anchored with rubber bands, but it fits and works just fine.  Out of the box or off the bench it flew very nicely.  It had a nasty warp in the wing that took some carefull bending and reshrinking the film with the heat gun, but all in all it's a nice product.  Much better then the TopFlite products.

Willis Swindell

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #11 on: September 20, 2007, 02:00:02 PM »
Mikey
It balances about quarter inch behind what the book calls for. I talked to Phil Spillman last night and he just flew his yesterday with a Brodak 25 on it and said it has plenty of power with .015 lines 60 ft long 7% fuel and no nose weight.
Willis y1

Offline Bill Little

  • 2017
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12671
  • Second in COMMAND
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #12 on: September 21, 2007, 09:50:50 AM »
HI Willis,

THe rule book allows .012 up to the .20, I know.......  I don't have the rule handy (changed last year??) to quote.  But, I *think* it goes up to .25 for .012.  As you know, though, it *might stretch* those .012s some! ;D
Big Bear <><

Aberdeen, NC

James Hylton Motorsports/NASCAR/ARCA

AMA 95351 (got one of my old numbers back! ;D )

Trying to get by

Offline MikeyPratt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 748
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #13 on: September 21, 2007, 10:19:17 AM »
Mikey
It balances about quarter inch behind what the book calls for. I talked to Phil Spillman last night and he just flew his yesterday with a Brodak 25 on it and said it has plenty of power with .015 lines 60 ft long 7% fuel and no nose weight.
Willis y1

Willis,
2-1/4" should be fine with a handle spacing of 3-3/4".  What you are looking for is a snappy turn without hopping coming out of the corners.  I've flown them at 2-3/4" back from the leading edge but the groove suffered somewhat.

Hi Andrew,
Try moving the CG forward and I think you will be happy with the overall results of the pattern.  It is always a compromise between flight trimming to get the best performance out of a model and to match the abilities of the pilot.  The original Force was designed for the pipe systems.  The deep fuselage was designed to hide the pipe when viewed in the profile.  I always wanted to try a 25 pipe engine on the P-Force but I'm was so happy with the .25 FP & LA that it didn't seem worth the trouble.  Someday I hope I can fly your model with the pipe setup.

Hi Bill,
I'm not sure that .012" lines are legal or not but at under 40 ounces I doubt there would be much stretch in the lines.  But I would try it before I would make a decision on that.

Later,
Mikey   

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22775
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #14 on: September 21, 2007, 10:33:28 AM »
Been flying my Primary Force short kit with an LA 25, stock muffler, aluminum spinner on 60 foot .012 cable lines.  Flies even better than when I had the Fox 35 Stunt with 60 foot .015 lines.  I watched Dan McEntee when he had his ARF PF out for the first time in St Louis.  He is running LA 25 I beleive, could be a Brodak 25.  I think both of us are using 10-4 props.  Have fun,  DOC Holliday
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Willis Swindell

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #15 on: September 21, 2007, 11:03:54 AM »
Bill
I know the feeling of stretchy lines I have a 72 oz ARF  Strega when I fly it with .018 lines. The handle feels like it has rubber bands for lines. I might try some solid lines or bring the Strega up to Huntersville and sell it. I just don’t like that big of a plane.
Willis  D>K

Offline Bill Little

  • 2017
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12671
  • Second in COMMAND
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #16 on: September 21, 2007, 08:46:09 PM »
Bill
I know the feeling of stretchy lines I have a 72 oz ARF  Strega when I fly it with .018 lines. The handle feels like it has rubber bands for lines. I might try some solid lines or bring the Strega up to Huntersville and sell it. I just don’t like that big of a plane.
Willis  D>K

I agree, Willis, I don't really care for a plane that size, either.  Aaron's Geo XL (Geo Bolt wing) at 62 oz. was plenty for me!
Big Bear <><

Aberdeen, NC

James Hylton Motorsports/NASCAR/ARCA

AMA 95351 (got one of my old numbers back! ;D )

Trying to get by

Willis Swindell

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #17 on: September 23, 2007, 06:17:07 PM »
I Flew my Primary Force today. Brodak 25, 62 ft .012 lines 9x5 APC prop, 10% 22 1/2 &1/2., 4.85 sec. inverted 5.1 upright . wing slightly high up right, slightly down inverted. engine set at 10,700 fast but smoking pretty good. balance point 2 3/4 inches from leading edge. The plane is stable almost too stable I have installed a longer control horn didn’t need to do that.
After I got home I dropped the tank down a 1/8 inch, ironed out the warp and moved the push rod down two holes. I had a bind in the controls but after moving the push rod down two holes the bind is gone. I am going to cut two feet off the lines so I can slow the engines RPM  down . The plane fly as good as any thing that I’m flying. Sig has done a great job on this ARF, the coverings better by far then the other ARFs
Willis D>K

Offline Chris McMillin

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1899
  • AMA 32529
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #18 on: September 25, 2007, 04:05:02 PM »
I Flew my Primary Force today. Brodak 25, 62 ft .012 lines 9x5 APC prop, 10% 22 1/2 &1/2., 4.85 sec. inverted 5.1 upright . wing slightly high up right, slightly down inverted. engine set at 10,700 fast but smoking pretty good. balance point 2 3/4 inches from leading edge. The plane is stable almost too stable I have installed a longer control horn didn’t need to do that.
After I got home I dropped the tank down a 1/8 inch, ironed out the warp and moved the push rod down two holes. I had a bind in the controls but after moving the push rod down two holes the bind is gone. I am going to cut two feet off the lines so I can slow the engines RPM  down . The plane fly as good as any thing that I’m flying. Sig has done a great job on this ARF, the coverings better by far then the other ARFs
Willis D>K



Willis,
I mistakenly left the cotter pin fair lead off of the wire pushrod at mid-length and found my son's Primary Force had a distinct lag in elevator reaction. I have been using carbon fibre or fibreglass pushrods for so long I had forgotten the need for this. Just a reminder in case you haven't installed one.

Good luck with your Primary force, Michael's is the most fun I've had with a profile since, 5th grade!

Chris...

Offline dennis lipsett

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1719
Re: Sig Primary Force
« Reply #19 on: October 12, 2007, 01:59:37 PM »
I flew my 2nd Primary Force on Tuesday Oct 9th. Power was a K&B Sportster 20. The plane flew well did not need any outboard weight though,strange. Prop was a 9/5, Fuel PowerMaster 10/29 used the Kavan tank which I've always disliked.Line tension was very good, rounds were good, squares are a little soft but generally the plane flew very well.
There were two other P/F there. One with a TT36, too heavy and does not impress me at all. Second one had an OS 35S on it and was flown by a low time pilot so we didn't see any maneuvers but it flew very well.However it needed /had a trim tab on it, should take it and do some tweaking on the wing with a heating iron.
My first one had a K&B 28 and I truly enjoyed it till it met it an unfortunate premature end. Using the 20 was an exercise simply to see if there would be a significant difference in the power. There is obviously a difference but the 20 does an admirable job.The overhead eights didn't suffer from lack of line tension and the wingover was firm through the maneuver.
I like models that have only moderate pull, existing medical condition makes stump pullers out of the question, and this is a very nice combination for me.
dennis


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here