stunthanger.com

Building Tips and technical articles. => 1/2 A building. => Topic started by: sleepy gomez on April 10, 2013, 08:35:39 PM

Title: thread for Cox .020 crankshaft.
Post by: sleepy gomez on April 10, 2013, 08:35:39 PM
Is a 5-40 or 5-48 the right crank shaft thread for the prop?
Title: Re: thread for Cox .020 crankshaft.
Post by: Tim Wescott on April 10, 2013, 08:52:18 PM
Cox 049 is 5-40.

#5 fine thread is 5-44; 5-48 doesn't exist in nature.

The thread on my PeeWee reed-valve 020 is 3-48 (well, at least it's .098" diameter, coarser than 2-56 and finer than 4-40 -- I'll take that to be 3-48).

What was LeRoy Cox thinking when he used those odd threads?
Title: Re: thread for Cox .020 crankshaft.
Post by: pat king on April 11, 2013, 10:59:09 AM
3-48 and 5-40 were very common at the time those engines were designed. I believe that a rationalization of screw sizes has virtually eliminated those sizes. 3-48 screws are perfect for mounting cox 1/2 A engines. 5-40 screws are great for .29- .35 size engine mounting.

Pat
Title: Re: thread for Cox .020 crankshaft.
Post by: dennis lipsett on April 11, 2013, 01:32:06 PM
3-48 are also the screw size for the Fox 049/07/10/15 engines also Gilbert and Wen Mac and most of the other early small engines. Perfect  products sold 3-48 mounting sets for years as I remember.

Dennis
Title: Re: thread for Cox .020 crankshaft.
Post by: Mike Lauerman on April 11, 2013, 03:51:12 PM
I still see them (5-40 and 3-48) as standards, in better hardware and fasteners' outlets.

What was supposed to have replaced them, please?  Metrics? 

No sarcasm intended here, I'm just alarmed. (stack this info on top of sequester, guns & roses, er, Magazines!  et al.)
Title: Re: thread for Cox .020 crankshaft.
Post by: Tim Wescott on April 11, 2013, 04:15:10 PM
I still see them (5-40 and 3-48) as standards, in better hardware and fasteners' outlets.

What was supposed to have replaced them, please?  Metrics? 

No sarcasm intended here, I'm just alarmed. (stack this info on top of sequester, guns & roses, er, Magazines!  et al.)

AFAIK they're just less popular than the even-numbered screws.