News:



  • June 16, 2025, 02:40:55 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Sterling S-4 Space . . . .  (Read 2138 times)

Offline Jim Thomerson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2087
Sterling S-4 Space . . . .
« on: June 10, 2010, 01:26:11 PM »
Allen Brickhaus in his stunt column in the July Flying Models discusses the Sterling S-4 1/2A kit. The Sterling S-4 was introduced as the "Space Kaydet", and is OTS legal.  The name was soon changed to "Space Master".  I think this was trademark or copyright issue.  Barry Baxter has a wonderful set of plans which show the shapes of all the sheet sides, drawn from a complete kit.  I built two of them, one with a McCoy 049 diesel, and I don't recall what the other had. As to the thin wing, there is a comment in one of the old Aeromodeller Annuals that for greatest efficiency, a wing should not have a thickness % greater than twice its chord in inches.  A 5 inch chord should not have more than 10% thick airfoil, for example. 

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4053
Re: Sterling S-4 Space . . . .
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2010, 10:06:25 PM »
What a ridiculous rule of thumb.  A 15" chord should have a 30% thick wing?  Give me a break!  When you get to a 50" wing you end up with a perfect cylinder.  I don't think so!   VD~
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline Jim Thomerson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2087
Re: Sterling S-4 Space . . . .
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2010, 09:10:30 AM »
Should have been clearer, the rule was in reference to wings with small chords, and was an upper limit.   D>K

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4053
Re: Sterling S-4 Space . . . .
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2010, 03:06:16 PM »
The rule doesn't even apply that well, no matter how you state it.  The 1/2A Snapper at 105 sq.in. area has a 15% airfoil and flies extremely well.  I have NEVER used less than 12%, and thought those models would have flown better with a thicker foil.  Generally on models now I stay around 17% with fixed flaps (or no flaps) and go to 20% if I am using flaps.  If your airfoil is very cleanly built, thicker foils generate very little extra drag.
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4053
Re: Sterling S-4 Space . . . .
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2010, 03:25:08 PM »
As an aside, the model shown in Flying Models is drop dead gorgeous as refinished by Mr Dahlke! Another aside, we are getting great stunting out of thin sheet wings in our experiments leading toward the Kwikee Stunt event.  Now that I have properly attached the engine, my BlackHawk Bristol bullet is showing promise, and it is a minimal model compared to Antone Kephart's sheet wing Baby Magician.  I'll try to get a photo of Antone's plane when I can.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2010, 04:15:40 PM by Larry Renger »
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Online Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 14463
Re: Sterling S-4 Space . . . .
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2010, 05:42:34 PM »
What a ridiculous rule of thumb.  A 15" chord should have a 30% thick wing?  Give me a break!  When you get to a 50" wing you end up with a perfect cylinder.  I don't think so!   VD~


   But then you get to 60" and it starts getting better again!

     Brett

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4053
Re: Sterling S-4 Space . . . .
« Reply #6 on: June 13, 2010, 10:20:12 PM »
Until you get to a flat plate at right angles to the slipstream, in which case stunting must be done in the style of the current R/C 3d guys (bleeeach!!!) {You sure that is flying??}
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12894
Re: Sterling S-4 Space . . . .
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2010, 10:40:07 AM »
Until you get to a flat plate at right angles to the slipstream, in which case stunting must be done in the style of the current R/C 3d guys (bleeeach!!!) {You sure that is flying??}
But I see Bi-slobs doing that.

I can only admire the 3D folks when they start looping in the length of the aircraft, or do a nice stable hover.

I can't imagine wanting to do that myself -- but I can imagine the amount of skill that goes into it, and admire it none the less.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline John Rist

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3043
Re: Sterling S-4 Space . . . .
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2010, 05:54:06 PM »
3-D is not for RC only.  Have you ever seen a Bi Slob (sold by Brodak). I have seen Rollin Keszler (Madison Alabama) put in a complete flight and complete maybe 3 laps.  The Bi Slob does a great saber dance.
Youtube link below

« Last Edit: June 15, 2010, 01:58:22 PM by John Rist »
John Rist
AMA 56277

Offline john e. holliday

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22974
Re: Sterling S-4 Space . . . .
« Reply #9 on: June 15, 2010, 09:34:17 AM »
Everybody needs a Bi-Slob in their stabe of planes.  It will change your perspective of flying.  It is also great when you see the guys on the R/C side of the field trying to figure out how you do that on control lines.   H^^
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline dennis lipsett

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1718
Re: Sterling S-4 Space . . . .
« Reply #10 on: June 19, 2010, 07:16:51 AM »
Everybody needs a Bi-Slob in their stabe of planes.  It will change your perspective of flying.  It is also great when you see the guys on the R/C side of the field trying to figure out how you do that on control lines.   H^^

Just remember John, one of those R/C guys is going to ask you to do a torque roll, a harrier or a blender or some of the other maneuvers. Not as a rebuttal to anyone here but skill is needed to do anything well in each  segment of the hobby. If skill wasn't needed then we would all be world champions.
I still like to fly R/C and do pattern and free style/3D maneuvers simply to keep my hand/eye cordination at a level that you don't get in C/l and I refuse to be apologetic about it. It's fun and I enjoy it the same as C/L. We all have to keep remembering it's model airplanes, it's supposed to be fun.
dennis

Tags: