News:



  • December 26, 2024, 08:07:17 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St  (Read 16048 times)

Offline Dan McEntee

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7227
Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« on: June 27, 2024, 04:39:45 PM »
   I have been playing with some smaller models for a while and recently acquired a Doodlebug stunt model , designed by Wild Bill Netzeband and this model was built by the late Jim Wilson, who was a local modeler here in St. Louis and had several small models published in the magazines over the years. Jim was very good at operating diesel engines and I'm betting that is what he had on the model, but I wanted to try a Norvel .961 Big Mig for the extra power, since it is a large model and I had hopes of flying it on longish lines.

   I have been having mixed results with the effort and have trouble getting consistent runs. Some flights are great, then a simple refuel and launch with out changing anything results in a flight that has the engine lean out and speed up, go rich and too slow, run along time on a measured amount of fuel , all over the place as far as performance. The engine has been broken in, and I have tried numerous props, fuel, and tanks. Sometimes it will go through 1 1/2 ounces of fuel , run like I want it to, and then keep running for 8 to 10 minutes. Lots of run away runs. I have tried standard tank, like a perfect #8 I think it is, and modified one with a better arranged pick up tube but still standard vent, and another one with a relocated pick up to better feed the engine with a shorter fuel line and a uniflow vent. This tank has shown the most promise but still no repeat consistency and have tried venting to atmosphere and muffler pressure. The muffler tend to work loose and wobble, since it's retained with a simple wire bale,  and thinking this might be the source of the problem, I glued the muffler to the flange with a small amount of red silicone to seal it and replaced the spring wire bale with some safety wire attached in the grooves front and back and then twisted on the back side to really secure the muffler and the silicone to seal it. The first flight today was VERY promising and performed exactly as I had hoped, but the next flight went astray again!! Fuel has been experimented with ranging from 10% SIG type fuel to 15% all synthetic and 15% SIG type fuel but at 18% total oil. I planned on trying some 25% nitro fuel but forgot the bottle this morning. I know the more nitro I have will allow the needle to open more and hopefully a consistent run but results still vary. I have two head gaskets in the engine and wonder if I have to add more?? 

   I have run these things for many hours on the TuffBaby trainers at Oshkosh, but that was just round and round training flights. My next thought with this is to get some supplies for bladder pressure and try a bladder on it and see what happens, and also go up the nitro ladder with 20% and 25% being in the que for the next flying session. So far, prop hasn't made a huge difference, but I'll keep experimenting. Does anyone have a set up that works well for them that I can try? One of my big problems is hearing the little booger!! I can't tell most time if it's slowing down because it's too lean or too rich?? Too rich will generally keep running. Too lean will usually quit. When things work correctly, this airplane flies pretty nice for a small model and my intensions are to just fly it like i do my other sport airplanes, but I gotta get a consistent run first.

    Any suggestions for a set up for the Norvel Big Mig .061??

   Type at you later,
    Dan McEntee
   
« Last Edit: June 28, 2024, 06:28:28 PM by Dan McEntee »
AMA 28784
EAA  1038824
AMA 480405 (American Motorcyclist Association)

Offline Motorman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 3558
Re: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2024, 06:53:56 PM »
I tried 10-15% nitro and the engine just ran too cold. I went to 20% nitro with 20% castor and it came to life. 1/2a engines like castor, helps them seal or something.

Using an APC 6-2 with good result but have made some 6-2.5 carbon props based off a Rev Up 6-3 wood. Big clunky props like mas or grish just drag the engine down too much.

A suction venturi and a fine NVA are critical on 1/2a and it's good to keep the vent tube far away from the pick up in the tank.

I think if you get the engine hotter it will run better. I run mine in a pretty good 4 stroke but the extra nitro keeps it lit.

Hope that helps,
MM 8)
« Last Edit: July 22, 2024, 07:49:31 PM by Motorman »

Offline ray copeland

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 874
Re: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2024, 12:53:36 PM »
I mostly run balloon tanks if possible, if not, the brodak bh-528b and bh-508 work well on profiles. I also run Sig 10%most of the time with the exception of the ame 's  that i have on combat planes they get 25%. Make sure the feed line from the tank is as short as possible. The cox 5x3 prop works great along with the apc 6x2 if the plane is too fast or the apc 5.5x2.5.. Maybe try a new or different plug, Nelsons work as well as the Kamtechnik turbo. Vibration can effect 1/2a's too. Norvel made a cold plug and head early on, took me a while to figure this out as the plug size and hole in the head are smaller and they needed a lot of nitro.
Maybe Ken Cook will see this and chime in with his experiences.
Ray from Greensboro, North Carolina , six laps inverted so far with my hand held vertically!!! (forgot to mention, none level!) AMA# 902150

Offline Dan McEntee

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7227
Re: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2024, 06:22:12 PM »
I mostly run balloon tanks if possible, if not, the brodak bh-528b and bh-508 work well on profiles. I also run Sig 10%most of the time with the exception of the ame 's  that i have on combat planes they get 25%. Make sure the feed line from the tank is as short as possible. The cox 5x3 prop works great along with the apc 6x2 if the plane is too fast or the apc 5.5x2.5.. Maybe try a new or different plug, Nelsons work as well as the Kamtechnik turbo. Vibration can effect 1/2a's too. Norvel made a cold plug and head early on, took me a while to figure this out as the plug size and hole in the head are smaller and they needed a lot of nitro.
Maybe Ken Cook will see this and chime in with his experiences.

   I didn't know about the cold plug. I'll have to check what I have. I have what I think are stock factory plugs and some Merlin plugs from Al Kelly. I'll have to check those. I may have a Galbreath head for the Nelson plugs that would fit also. Now that I think about it, I started out with a Merlin plug and head, and then installed a stock Big Mig head and Norvel plug. The last session flights tended to slow down like the engine was getting more rich, an indication of the plug being too cold?  I've run these on 10% nitro many time before in a trainer mode and don't recall ever having this uneven run but those were mounted on a tank mount. Engine is sidewinder on a profile fuselage, and custom tank to put the tank as close as possible with a pretty short fuel line path. I'm gonna go look at some heads and plugs Thanks for the feedback.

 Type at you later,
  Dan McEntee
AMA 28784
EAA  1038824
AMA 480405 (American Motorcyclist Association)

Online kenneth cook

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1491
Re: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2024, 06:38:42 PM »
             One thing to keep in mind in regards to Perfect tanks is that they're far from perfect. The pickup is NEVER soldered in the rear of the tank. It's anyone's guess as to where it is in the tank. In addition, the tubing is not seamless and the type of brass used has a tendency to split. Therefore , regardless if the tank is new or used, it's certainly worth taking it apart.

       I have to ask what style Norvel are you running? Is this a Rev-Lite version with the round cylinder head or is it the older nickle plated square style head? I ask this because the Rev-Lite version uses a bolt in venturi. The fit and the o-ring totally blows which can leak air causing very erratic running. I find better thickness o-rings to replace them and I also if needed use a bit of JB weld to insure it seals.

          Anytime I try and run a tank on a 1/2A profile, I do my best to sink the tank into the fuse to assist in aligning the pickup tube with the venturi. The Norvel needs to run at high rpm's to sustain fuel draw and it doesn't take much to upset this. Therefore, if your using a wedge tank the chances are your pickup tube is too far outboard and your engine is already suffering a lean condition.

            Dan, while you mention the engine is broken in, it's not uncommon for these engines to pick up aluminum from riding in the case and it essentially gets burnished onto the shaft at the nose. Usually, this becomes quite noticeable when the shaft won't just fall out of the case. I polish them up and remove this. It's a remedy for the shaft but it really doesn't repair the case. This can act like a brake when the engine is running and this too can essentially make the engine run all over the map.


          One thing I've experienced with Norvel's is that I can run them on 10% stunt fuel and achieve the same performance as I do on Cox TD's running 25% nitro. I only run as much as I need. I also use Nelson /Galbreath setups. Greg from Kamtechnik is the only person producing Nelson head buttons for Cox/Norvel. He also produces them in turbo plug varieties. If your running two gaskets and haven't taken out a plug with the lean runs you've been experiencing, I personally wouldn't add anymore.

          I have to agree 100% with Ray's comment about the 5.5x2.5, this prop is not the same as the 5.5x2  so don't confuse them. You mention that the muffler is coming loose which I find a bit alarming as if the engine is vibrating. Could you place some aluminum pads under the engine? This will not only give the engine some footprint preventing vibration but it will also shim the engine further off of the fuse moving it closer to the pickup in the tank.

        One thing I discovered with the Al Kelly plugs are that the red hot plug is TOO HOT and it causes pre ignition. Obviously, using additional head gaskets circumvented this but just turning the prop to clock it into position would cause a aggressive backfire.
       


           

Offline 944_Jim

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 898
Re: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2024, 06:41:09 PM »
Mr. Dan,
I ran into an issue with a Cox .051 and high compression head. Sometimes it ran fine...other times an absolute dog. And this was on days where I could spend a few hours trying to fly on "same fuel," so it wasn't a "different weather, different day" kind of thing.

FredV4 and I talked this one through for a few days (over weeks of trying). He kept asking how I knew I wasn't over-compressed since all the variables were carefully tracked. One day I opened the top of the cylinder and chucked a few head gaskets in there.

It was a night and day difference! Now the engine merrily hauled the plane around, up, down and inverted.

Try the engine with a standard Cox glowhead. Yeah, it will look funny with a puny head. But it will keep heat in the top end, and may alleviate the issues. If nothing else, this one is a cheap test.

Offline Dave Moritz

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 455
Re: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« Reply #6 on: June 28, 2024, 06:55:38 PM »
Dan

I’ve gleaned much info on the Norvel Big Mig 061 from these and the defunct Stuka Stunt pages. A four-page document - will be happy to email it to you.

By the way, Rockin’ Rusty put up a good argument for breaking these engines in via heat cycling with a heat gun. Great technique, it worked for me. It’s included in the document plus a ton of other tips.

Dave Mo…
The packaging is the product (with apologies to Marshall McLuhan).

Offline Dan McEntee

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7227
Re: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« Reply #7 on: June 28, 2024, 07:17:06 PM »
Dan

I’ve gleaned much info on the Norvel Big Mig 061 from these and the defunct Stuka Stunt pages. A four-page document - will be happy to email it to you.

By the way, Rockin’ Rusty put up a good argument for breaking these engines in via heat cycling with a heat gun. Great technique, it worked for me. It’s included in the document plus a ton of other tips.

Dave Mo…

  Thanks Dave!! Just sent you a PM.

  Dan McEntee
AMA 28784
EAA  1038824
AMA 480405 (American Motorcyclist Association)

Online Jim Hoffman

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 594
Re: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« Reply #8 on: June 29, 2024, 02:27:39 PM »
They run great stock.  Add Nitro, 15% minimum

Offline Dan McEntee

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7227
Re: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« Reply #9 on: June 29, 2024, 09:11:47 PM »
   Thanks for the input gentleman!! I've been thinking this through, replaying in my mind what I've experienced, and compared that to your responses. Like I said, I have hundreds of hours of experience with these Norvels in a trainer mode, and I can get just about any 1/2A engine, and others, to do what i want them to do. Cox, Fox, OS, ST, Enya, Saito, they are all in my engine footlockers and all get used at some point. This engine came out of my Norvel stash of both .049 and .061 engines, both Big Mig and AME versions. I'm gonna answer some of your question while I cool off from test running the engine in the drive way, and I see an improvement tonight while testing glow plugs.

   Glow plugs: I have everything that has been recommended in the way of glow plugs, here and on the thread I posted on C.E.F . I have some Merlin plugs with their head, I have some of what I think are stock Norvel, I have both standard and TD Cox .049 glow heads, and I have both the Kamteknik and Galbreath heads for Nelson plugs with a good supply of Nelson plugs.  Kenneth Cook: I compared the Merlin plug side by side to the Norvel plug. The merlin plugs I have look like they have a smaller coil, in a smaller hole in the chamber. The Norvel look much larger, on the order of what you see in a Cox head. I think that would make the Norvel a hotter plug, would it not? If things go well and it turns out my problems came from a boogered up spray bar and needle, I'll try them both later.

   Props: I don't have a huge selection, and none of the 5" APCs that have been mentioned. I may trim one of the 5.7-3 props I have down and see how that goes. I have Cox 5-3 gray, some Tornado 5-3 three blade props like Larry Renger said he really likes, and some Tornado 5-3 two blade. I think I have some small MAS three blade in their new design that I have to dig out yet but not sure what size.

   Tanks: the tanks I'm using start out as Perfect tanks, but I have pulled the end cap off and reworked the pick up tubes. Some of these are the #8 tank (I think) that is supposed to be a 2 ounce tank but really only holds about 1 3/4 ounce, and the pick up tube comes out the top of the tank about half way back from the front. On the ones I have taken apart, both pick up tubes were way high and like Ken said, not anchored at the back. I made one #8 tank that is standard vent with a new pick up tube that exits in the middle of the front end cap, and angles down to make fuel line routing better. All tubes are 1/8" copper. and I'm using medium fuel line to feed the engine. This idea comes from some stuff I have read and talked with people about flying the big tuned pipe engines and using bigger than normal pick up tubes and fuel line on their models. I am using the pink Prather fuel line. When the engine is running, I can really see what the fuel is flowing like.. I built up another #8 that is uniflow with a new pick up tube and the uniflow went is anchored about half way up the pick up tube, which exits about the same place the other tank does and turns 90 degrees down. I also have a Perfect tank that is a 1 1/4 ounce tank, standard vent, that is more or less brand new and I haven't opened up. In flying this airplane so far, all these tanks seem to run pretty much the same.. I started with a 2 ounce plastic tank, because it would fit, and I had one, but could never get it to run a whole tank of fuel out.  I was figuring I would need a capacity of 1 to 13/4 ounces to do a full pattern comfortably on 42" to 44" length lines, and so far I have been in that range and will stick with these tanks and keep testing.

    Fuel:  I have tried standard SIG 10% Champion because I have run these on this before and it's my main go to fuel. Never had any problems. I have run 15% nitro Cool Power with some castor added with no real improvement or changes, and no obvious problems with it either.  Before the last flying session, I had found a gallon of Byrons 15% nitro, 50/50 oil in my stash. I have a quart of Norvel brand fuel ( probably made by SIG, as it looks just like their mixes and they were the original importer of the engines) and it say 18% total oil on the label, so I added enough extra castor to get it up to that and maybe a bit more. I ran this fuel last time out, with a few drops of Amoral in it ( I have ALWAYS kept a small bottle in my flight supply bag and have never had any plug issues from it either) and I think the engine ran best on this mix so far, so I will continue with that. I'll try a few tanks of the 25% Norvel stuff next time, especially if things have improved, I have the supplies now to mix anything I want, also.

   The Model;  The airplane is a Wild Bill Netzeband Doodlebug. I am pretty sure it's the middle size airplane from the article he presented in the February 2003 Flying Models magazine called "The Doodlebug Brothers". it's about 25" span, and with a chord of 8.75" that puts it in the 200 sq.in. range which would be the middle model of the three sizes he presented in that article, with the smallest being for .049, the middle one intended for the .061, and the largest one is intended for the .074. It weighs 12 ounces I think, and when things have been right, the .061 pulls it just fine, with the engine running  ( I think ) in the high 17,000 to 18,000 RPM range and it flies just fine on the 42 to 44ft fishing line I'm using.

  The engine: I think it's a Norvel .061 Big Mig , with the bigger diameter head and cylinder. It may have come off a Bratco Sky Baby or Hexdrone airplane. It might also be a NV version. The needle valve goes back at an angle which I like. It has the bolt on venturi. I had an inverted landing early on  in this project which bent the spray bar. I did not have a spare, so I had to straighten it out. NV engine didn't have any new ones in stock for a while. Sometime this year I saw they had complete venturi with the NVA in it so picked up a couple of those. I did a standard break in, which I am very familiar with, after all of them I have run and used at KidVenture, but this one had a bit of time on it and it was no trouble at all. Still has quite good compression, and only sticks at the top of the stroke when it's stone cold and no fuel in the cylinder. it starts right now with a 1/2 electric starter. I found a good deal on one of those long, black GlowBee battery powered starters with a charger on eBay once, and now it comes in handy with some new batteries. I solved the loose muffler issue by gluing it on with red silicone and replaced the wire bail that it comes with to hold it on with some safety wire on each end, then twisted the two ends on the back side of the engine to hold it tight. I have to run the muffler for the pressure fitting.

    Last session, the last several flights all seemed to slow down from things going rich, just slow enough that I couldn't fly the pattern. It did it with the uniflow tank and with the 1 1/4 ounce tank, almost exactly the same each time. After reading everything you all have posted here and on C.E.F, and thinking about what I have done so far, I took the following actions. Today, I pulled the venturi off. It had never been off before and it feels like it's almost a friction fit in adding to the O-ring and bolt through the venturi to hold it in place. I was going to use a whole new assembly, but when I tried to put it in, it didn't fit  well, and the spray bar went straight through so the needle was NOT swept back like the original. That made it really hard to put the fuel line on the nipple because the end of the muffler is in the way. So I just pulled the spray bar out of that venturi, and  pout it in the old one, and used some red hi-temp silicone to help seal it when I put it back in. I also put a short length of fuel line on the threaded portion before putting the needle in, like we do on a lot of engine, to help seal the thread against air leaks. I had been running it like that the last few time out and it seems to help.   Kenneth Cook : I have noted the idea of building up a one of these new venturis with the Cox needle valve assemble that you made mention of. I have all the stuff, but didn't want to get that deep into it tonight. I put everything back together and headed out to the driveway to test glow plugs.

    I started out with what I thought would be the bottom rung of the ladder, and that was the stock Cox glow head, like 944_Jim suggested. ( Thanks Jim!!) I have run some of mine with these before and knew that would fit. Al Kelly clued me in that the Norvel, Cox and Testors heads would all interchange. The threads were really just ever so slightly different, but not enough to cross thread them or cause any problems and I have found that to be true. I used the same 15% Bryons fuel I spiked up with some extra castor. I shook the bottle and still no foam. Engine started easy as usual, needled it in slowly through 17,000 RPM and then about 17,500, it quit like it was over lean but really sounded like it had just got into a wet 2 stroke. I repeated this several times and it did it at the same tach reading , so I made note of that and moved on.

   The next plug was a Cox TD high compression head. The only difference I can see in these is that the combustion chamber  on the standard head is bigger, and the TD head is more flat across the bottom surface. I installed that, fired it up and got more RPM, into the 19,000 range and higher but didn't go so far as to see when it went over lean and quit. It seemed to run much better, much more steady that previous static runs. Before, it would seem to needle Ok , then hit a spot where the RPM would just take off, right about the high 17,000 range like I need it to be. I added a head gasket but that didn't seem to help at the time, and I left it in there, so there are two head gaskets still..

   Next came the Galbreath/Nelson plug combination, again with two head gaskets. It seemed to pick up right where the Cox TD head left off, very similar run, but seemed to needle a bit better. I could put it anywhere I wanted between 17,500 and 18,200, which is where I think I want it. Run time on a full 1 1/4 ounce in the standard vent tank ran very smooth and consistent. Up to this point, I wonder how necessary uniflow is on these engines in this RPM range?? Flight tests will help answer that question. I can make more of these tanks with a uniflow vent in this capacity, maybe 1.5 ounces, if need be.. When running in these tests, I can see just a few bubbles , and I mean very few, ever now and then. The fuel line stays clear, almost like there is nothing in it. I have one of those small diameter fuel filter in the middle of the fuel line, after thinking that I needed that , plus filtering my fuel when getting a syringe full. I did not try the Kamtechnik head, because when compared side by side to the Galbreath head, the head surface and combustion chamber size looked the same, so I don't expect a big change, if any, when I use it. I'll try it after test flying a few flights.

    One things came to me while I was typing out this diatribe!! I have some of those Wasp .061 R/C engines that Hobby People used to sell so cheap, and some one used to put out a replacement venturi for them that used a TD spray bar and needle. I am pretty sure there are some extensive threads on here on how some guys did their own modifications. I made up a couple of my own and installed them, but never ran them. If this engine continues to give me fits, I can just swap it out for the Wasp .061 really easy. I think I remember the engine getting good reviews for power and being pretty much like the Norvel. I'll dig one of those out and look it over. Maybe the muffler will interchange if I have to use these straight verturis from NV engines?? More experiments to come.

   I have several 1/2A stunt kits in my stash, plus a whole pile of plans and other ideas to try. Now is the time to get to them!! I really liked the
 Leprechaun Legends planes that I have plans for also. My first real 1/2A stunt model was a Gremlin, that I still have, that I blew the plans for it up out of Model Builder magazine and built it with the wood from the Admiral River Boat life preserver balsa wood!! I powered it with a TD .049 and it was the first C/L stunt airplane that I ever did any outside square loops with!! I may get that down off the wall, recover it and put it back in action!! Thanks a lot to all of you again for your input and suggestions. Dave Moritz : Thanks for the email with the engine information. I will save it to my computer and print out some hard copies for future reference. I again thank everyone for taking the time to respond and I will update after test flying again, possibly tomorrow.

  Type at you later,
   Dan McEntee
AMA 28784
EAA  1038824
AMA 480405 (American Motorcyclist Association)

Offline Dan McEntee

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7227
Re: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« Reply #10 on: July 12, 2024, 09:11:37 PM »
Mr. Dan,
I ran into an issue with a Cox .051 and high compression head. Sometimes it ran fine...other times an absolute dog. And this was on days where I could spend a few hours trying to fly on "same fuel," so it wasn't a "different weather, different day" kind of thing.

FredV4 and I talked this one through for a few days (over weeks of trying). He kept asking how I knew I wasn't over-compressed since all the variables were carefully tracked. One day I opened the top of the cylinder and chucked a few head gaskets in there.

It was a night and day difference! Now the engine merrily hauled the plane around, up, down and inverted.

Try the engine with a standard Cox glowhead. Yeah, it will look funny with a puny head. But it will keep heat in the top end, and may alleviate the issues. If nothing else, this one is a cheap test.

    I have made some strides and have been getting some good runs, one right after another.  First, I tried test runs in the driveway with the assortment of heads/glow plugs that I have, and decided to run the Galbreath Nelson head. I have the habit of mounting profile tanks with rubber bands, especially when trimming a new airplane, so if I need to change tanks for any reason, it's much easier, and easier to move the tank up and down. I finally settled on a location, and then I mounted the tank on brackets but still have some foam under the tank, one of the perfect 2 ounce #8 tanks I modified. The last flying session I had, I was getting really nice runs, upright and inverted, insides and outsides, and the engine just sounded "happy". I'm still on 15% nitro fuel, basically a SIG Champion mix, and dropped down to a 5-3 prop I made from a 5.7-3 that I cut down and balanced. All this made a big difference. I ordered up some of the recommended 5.5-2.5 APC props plus some of their 5-3 and was hoping they would be here by now but the local USPS distribution center has been sitting on them for a couple of days!!! And they are only 3 miles from my house!!.  The tank I modified is too big. It has a 1 3/4 ounce capacity but runs forever on that much. I can short tank it down to to 1 1/2 ounces and it still runs over 8 minutes. I'm afraid to short tank it any more for fear of it causing problems picking up fuel on start up and take off, and at the end of the pattern in the clover, so I made a new tank that holds 1 1/2 ounces, so I can try short tanking it to 1 1/4 ounces. More test flights tomorrow morning. I am at the point that if the engine likes this new tank, I can really start trimming the airplane and testing props. It flies a decent pattern now, with the triangle being a bit mushy. I've worked on the controls some more and I think that should improve.

  I went with a 2 ounce tank to start with, not really having any experience with trying to get a whole pattern in on a 1/2A model. I'm on 44 foot lines (eye to eye) using 20 pound Spectra, and trying for 4.3 to 4.5 second lap times. I don't think you can slow one of these things down to 5 seconds, unless it's super light. The Doodlebug weighs 12 ounces and has 200 plus sq. in. of area. It generally feels pretty good, but I'm finally getting it into my head that I have more to learn about props for these. I have a Brodak ARF Baby Clown with a Medallion .049 on it, and it swings the Cox 5-3 prop with ease, like it's got more torque. The Norvel acts like it' was over propped with one of these, and I may try cutting one down to 4.5. I don't have a way to measure pitch on these, my Prather gauge just won't work, but would like to try that prop at 2 or 2.5" pitch. I 'll get into testing props more in the near future.
 
     Doers the fuel load I'm needing jive with what you guys are using to do the complete AMA pattern. i will be happy is I can get a consistent 7 minute run, maybe a bit less. Might play around with heads and gaskets some more also once I get to enjoy really flying it. It's been a challenge an fun so far. I got a stack of kits, foam wings, and lots of plans for these little boogers!!
  Type at you later,
   Dan McEntee
AMA 28784
EAA  1038824
AMA 480405 (American Motorcyclist Association)

Offline Motorman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 3558
Re: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« Reply #11 on: July 18, 2024, 07:38:01 PM »
It would be better to fully round off the tips of the Cox 5-3 than to cut it shorter.

Offline Chuck Matheny

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 801
Re: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« Reply #12 on: September 06, 2024, 08:01:25 PM »
Hello Dan.

I used to have the same problem mostly with the first generation AMEs.
It was Larry Driskill who figured out that the crankshaft fit was a little bit too tight and this caused a "run away" overheating of the whole engine.
Enough to swell the piston and get it to seize in the most extreme cases.
IIRC he would chuck the crank into a drill motor and give it a quick polish with fine sandpaper. I think the key words here are FINE PAPER and QUICK POLISH.
He only worked on the middle part of the crank journal, leaving the extreme ends of the load bearing surface as is.
Afterwards,  be willing to bench run it and  nurse the engine through a few tanks of fuel until you see the damn thing behaving as it should.
Muffler pressure ought to give you pretty steady runs with a triangle shaped [wedge] tank with just the single vent for the incoming muffler pressure.

By the time this "service bulletin" came out about polishing the crank journal I had already sworn off Norvels...but now that I know about this remedy I might try a Big Mig or AME again.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2024, 10:04:57 PM by Chuck Matheny »

Offline Dan McEntee

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7227
Re: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« Reply #13 on: September 08, 2024, 09:04:01 PM »
  Hi Chuck;
    Thanks for the information. I have had to set that project aside for a bit but may just tear that engine down and check it out. Doesn't seem that tight when flipping it through cold after choking it to start. The last couple of session I seemed to hit a good combo with going back to stock glow plug and the APC 5.5 X 2.5 that had been recommended to me. I guess if there is any heating an d friction I will see it in the cranks journal?? Maybe by this coming weekend I can get to that. i want to swap it out for a Wasp .061 that I converted to a TD venturi and see how that engine performs compared to the Norvel. I have read several good reports on those.
   Thanks again and Type at you later,
     Dan McEntee
AMA 28784
EAA  1038824
AMA 480405 (American Motorcyclist Association)

Offline 944_Jim

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 898
Re: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« Reply #14 on: November 21, 2024, 03:40:43 PM »
Maybe by this coming weekend I can get to that. i want to swap it out for a Wasp .061 that I converted to a TD venturi and see how that engine performs compared to the Norvel.
   Thanks again and Type at you later,
     Dan McEntee


Mr. Dan,
I'd love to see pics and read details please.

Jim in NE MS...a southern hockey fan!

Offline Dan McEntee

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7227
Re: Norvel .061 Big Mig for Semi-Serious St
« Reply #15 on: November 22, 2024, 03:24:59 PM »

Mr. Dan,
I'd love to see pics and read details please.

Jim in NE MS...a southern hockey fan!

  Hey Jim;
    I never got around to pulling the Norvel for examination. I got involved with the Cox reed dilemma and worked my way through that ( which ended up being I'm using a .005" thick reed made from plastic shim stock and it has gone more than a dozen flights very satisfactorily) , then some more of life, a contest and other trials and tribulations prevented more flying and now old man Winter is knocking at the door.
    The last flights I put on the Doodlebug went pretty well with the APC 5.5 by 2.5 and the stock head, and that's where I'll pick things back up next spring. I'll have the Wasp ready to go in after about 4 or 5 flights with the Norvel to get familiar with it again.
   Thanks for checking in!!
   HAPPY THANKSGIVING!!
   Dan McEntee
AMA 28784
EAA  1038824
AMA 480405 (American Motorcyclist Association)

Tags: