This evening, I was out in the "Skunk Works" doing some R&D that might be of interest to folks who like small diesel engines. I am experienced at operating most small English and European diesels and also McCoy units but I have not until tonight try to run an OK Cub. I have a new .075 which hasn't seen fuel and recently I Ebayed a used .049.
I decided to try to start the .049 using the standard diesel fuel mix of 1 part ether, 1 part kerosene, 1 part castor and 2% amyl nitrate. No luck.... the engine would only pop when the contra-piston was fully screwed down to the max compression position.
I thought either the engine was worn out or the "O" ring was leaking. I replaced the "O" ring and still no luck. I then checked the piston/cylinder fit and found that the engine would hold compression for some time, so the fit was good.
It was obvious that the engine could not be compressed enough to run and this is because the contra-piston has a flange that limits the the amount of compression available. I'm sure Herkimer did this to keep engines from coming back with bent con rods because of the actions of overzealous ham-handed kids.
I had heard that OKs would only run on OK fuel and this may be true. I don't know what the formula of OK fuel is but it may contain a greater % of ether.
Upon removing the head and c-piston and measuring the gap at max compression, I found the gap to be a whopping .060", too much for such a short stroke engine.
What to do? I was going to make a new C-piston without a flange but got lazy and removed the flange on the stock c-piston using my lathe.
I reassembled the engine, fueled it up, flipped and compressed it until it started and it ran like a charm.
I'd like to know what other modeler's experiences are regarding the OKs.
Is the removal of the flange going to be needed on all the Cubs in order to get them to run on standard fuel?
Orv.