News:


  • April 19, 2024, 06:15:48 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific  (Read 2441 times)

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« on: December 20, 2022, 10:11:12 AM »
   I am refining this drawing as I build.
I'm not including every detail but experienced
modelers should be able to work from
the dimensions shown.
  The pictures should fill in a lot of gaps.
Walt Musciano's drawings were pretty loose
and they evolved over several production runs.
I have tried to stay as close as possible
to the kit.

  The main feature of this plane was the
decal sheet that came with the kit.
I plan to do a second drawing showing
the dimensions of the sunbursts.

If you download my drawing be sure
to get the latest update. I'm adding details
as I build.

I'm planning on a second drawing that
shows the sunburst dimensions.

Cheers! - K.
« Last Edit: December 26, 2022, 08:53:16 AM by goozgog »
Keith Morgan

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22769
Re: Just a test . More soon
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2022, 12:25:03 PM »
Looks good to this old man. D>K
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Chuck Matheny

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 790
Re: Just a test . More soon
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2022, 01:30:16 PM »
I wonder what it would fly like with a pair of fat / symmetrical airfoils...?

Online 944_Jim

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 849
Re: Just a test . More soon
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2022, 02:15:49 PM »
Oooh, teasing us again?

Looks good to me. Bravo!

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Just a test . More soon
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2022, 03:39:31 PM »
Everyone here knows how to build a Musciano.
This is just how I do it.
  I've told parts of this story before but it
belongs here so I'm indulging myself.

   The first time I ever saw a C/L plane
was visiting my Uncle in Meriden Connecticut
in 1962. It was a Voodoo with a Green head Torpedo.
An older boy (12) had just come home from a contest
and the Voodoo had castor oil dripping from it's
yellow silk .  I didn't touch it but I could smell it.
Coco Channel never knew such a powerful fragrance.
I was seven and I desperately wanted a
 "Gas Model Airplane".
I asked for one every Christmas and every birthday
but it never came.

  Most of us remember cutting grass, collecting bottles
and doing chores to pay for airplanes. Finally in 1967
we were visiting Clearwater Florida and I had ten dollars.
The real hobby shop in Clearwater was the House of Hobbies
on Fort Harrison but I didn't know about it.
  Today it's hard to believe that the fancy Maas Brother's
department store near the causeway carried C/L stuff
but they did. There was one Scientific Kit and one red
Cox RTF Pitts. I must have stood there for an hour weighing
the kit against the plastic Pitts.
My guardian angel might have been watching over me
and I walked out of there with this Scientific Little Stinker
and a brand new Baby Bee.

   Walt Musciano made more adolescent dreams come true
than a thousand prom dances. Most of the Scientific Kits
were easy enough to build and flew well enough that
they were worth cutting all those lawns for.

  When I opened the Little Stinker box, There, on top, was
the most beautiful and luxurious decal sheet that any
kit from anywhere ever came with. Sixteen inches of
crisp red sunburst, pinstriped numbers and little skunks.
When you're twelve, things like that are important,
as some might remember.

  I don't know how I managed to build this biplane straight.
I used Talcum and clear dope to seal the wood, then
a coat of white dope. I'm not sure how I found the skill to
apply the decals but when it was finished I would wake
up at night and hold my plane.
I couldn't believe I owned it.

  Andy was the lucky boy in our neighborhood who's
father built models.
His house backed onto an open field with tall grass.
Andy and his dad had been  trying and failing to fly his
TopFlite P47 from a tipped up sheet of plywood.
It was a hot August day and a few bored boys came
to watch me crash. They teased me about the plastic
pilot since it was someone called Betty.
   I started the baby Bee and Andy held the whining
little thing as I ran out to my red plastic Carl Goldberg
handle.

Andy let go.

   The Stinker jumped off the plywood and somehow
locked into steady flight. I was afraid to move the handle
as the laps counted up. It flew for eight full laps before
the bay Bee quit and the plane hit the tall grass.
  It was the first time any kid in our area ever saw a
"gas model airplane" actually fly.
A week later there were probably ten little airplanes
waiting their turn for the plywood.

 We all have memories of that one special plane
that carried our boyish dreams.
This one was mine and I'm building a replica.



   
   

 

« Last Edit: December 20, 2022, 04:48:47 PM by goozgog »
Keith Morgan

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22769
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2022, 07:52:55 PM »
Its going to be fun to see this develope. D>K
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2022, 07:09:55 AM »
Hello Doc and Jim !
The usual suspects   <=

  Thanks for your interest Chuck.
If you check out my 1/2A Focke-Wulf  build
you'll know why I'm not building this
Stinker as a prime stunt plane.

 https://stunthanger.com/smf/12-a-building/focke-wulf-190d-stunter-build/
Keith Morgan

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #7 on: December 21, 2022, 07:20:10 AM »
Scientific published two and a half versions
Of the Little Stinker.
   The earlier version shows an inverted OK Cub
and the newer version shows an upright Cox.
Both drawings share a plan view that doesn't
agree with either version but does show the
paint scheme of the full size plane.
  These drawings were never meant for building.
They were abbreviated and part of the assembly
instructions.
  What I've drawn and posted here is as accurate
as I could measure from the plans and two actual
Muscianos.
Scientific was a little loose about consistency
but that's OK. These kits worked.
« Last Edit: December 21, 2022, 07:38:29 AM by goozgog »
Keith Morgan

Offline Chuck Matheny

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 790
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #8 on: December 21, 2022, 07:34:25 AM »
Hello Doc and Jim !
The usual suspects   <=

  Thanks for your interest Chuck.
If you check out my 1/2A Focke-Wulf  build
you'll know why I'm not building this
Stinker as a prime stunt plane.

 https://stunthanger.com/smf/12-a-building/focke-wulf-190d-stunter-build/

I understand...!
Your  FW 190 "programme" would be hogging all of my attention if I were you.... H^^

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #9 on: December 21, 2022, 07:39:56 AM »
  I shaped the outside of the log before
I hollowed it on the drill press.
I just did the Shoeshine sanding technique
to round the front of the fuselage.
 This works well but I still
needed to use a circular gouge to thin the
shell.
  It's important to leave some thickness
behind the firewall and back at the rudder stock
since these are the stressed areas.
Keith Morgan

Offline Juan Valentin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • USAF 1969-73 ANG 73-77
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #10 on: December 21, 2022, 09:18:34 AM »
  I shaped the outside of the log before
I hollowed it on the drill press.
I just did the Shoeshine sanding technique
to round the front of the fuselage.
 This works well but I still
needed to use a circular gouge to thin the
shell.
  It's important to leave some thickness
behind the firewall and back at the rudder stock
since these are the stressed areas.


 Hello Keith
                           You have done an excellent job with the Little stinker plan. I have saved your drawing in my docs.  I did the hollowing on my Scientific Little bipe Using a pair of sanding drums and a wood boring bit that I modified rounding the blade. I used the small sanding drum and went slowly since I didn`t clamp the fuse too tight then I used the bigger one doing shallow cuts until I got the wood removed to where I wanted and I finished with the rounded boring bit. I did not leave the wood at the front of the fuselage but will follow your advice on a next project. I started a little stinker years back but didn`t get far just the fuse. I really like the scientific hollow logs. Thanks for posting the plan.
                                                                                                                                                                                      Juan








Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #11 on: December 22, 2022, 05:16:32 AM »
Hello Juan !

  It's good to hear from you.
Merry Christmas and I hope all is
good with you and yours.

  Yes! Don't clamp it in the vice
too tight !
As the picture shows, I didn't
rely on the drill press to thin the
shell down to where I wanted it.
  When we were kids we would just
glue it together as supplied. We didn't
know any better but they flew OK
anyway.
   I'm walking a line between reproducing
the plane I built back then and building
the new one correctly.
  When I thinned the log, I left extra meat
behind the firewall and at the wing root.
« Last Edit: December 22, 2022, 05:39:06 AM by goozgog »
Keith Morgan

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #12 on: December 22, 2022, 05:41:57 AM »
I think the hardest part of this build
is shaping the turtle deck / head rest.
It took two tries before it looked like
the original drawings.
  My mistake was rounding the top of the
entire log before I glued on the head rest
block. Ooops!

  My original plane had the cockpit open
and it collected oil and dirt.
This time I'm closing it in with 1/16 sheet.
Progress!
Keith Morgan

Offline Chuck Matheny

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 790
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #13 on: December 22, 2022, 08:41:43 PM »
I think the hardest part of this build
is shaping the turtle deck / head rest.
It took two tries before it looked like
the original drawings.
  My mistake was rounding the top of the
entire log before I glued on the head rest
block. Ooops!

  My original plane had the cockpit open
and it collected oil and dirt.
This time I'm closing it in with 1/16 sheet.
Progress!
looks good..!!
sure wsh I had $100 to spend on that much balsa wood now.... H^^

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #14 on: December 23, 2022, 04:09:43 AM »
  Hey Chuck.  I bought a squeeze bottle
of carpenters glue at Home Despot for this
project.  $6.50 !
  Lucky that I have lots of materials hoarded.

   I sanded the wings out of a nice piece of
1/4". Since both wings are the same dimensions
I made a 36" length using a long sanding board
and lots of pencil lines. #100 grit works well.
It's course enough that shaping requires fewer
strokes so there's less chance of wobbles.
Obviously I finished with finer grit paper.

  The trailing edge is 1/6" thick so I did the old
carpenter's trick of pinching a pencil and using
my finger as a guide as I pulled a line down the
T.E. 
  The Leading Edge is just more of the same.

 Wing tips are all just half circles with a 1-1/2"
radius, then sanded down to a 1/16" tip.
  The photo shows a way to use masking tape
to keep the sand paper working where you
want it and to define a straight edge where the tip
taper begins on the upper surface of the wing.
Keith Morgan

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #15 on: December 23, 2022, 06:34:47 AM »
  A difficult thing about building any biplane is
getting the wings and thrust line at the
correct angles. Walt solved this by making the
bottom of the fuselage and both wing bottoms
parallel. No diverging angles. That's probably why
my ignorant twelve year old self got it right.

   A major issue with the Stinker is keeping the
top wing attached. Back then I carried a tube
of Ambroid and kept re-gluing everything back.
Now I use PVA carpenters glue because it has a
little flexibility. Ambroid was brittle.

You can see it the picture that I cut the
interplane struts out of 1/16" ply with
tabs that fit into slots in the wings. I sandwiched
the ply with 1/8" balsa each side then sanded to
a foil.
  The original cabane struts were 1/16 x 3/16" hard
balsa and were attached in a "scale" position.
These struts were weak and didn't do much to
brace the upper wing.
  I'm going to deviate from the plans and
cut them from ply.

 
Keith Morgan

Offline Chuck Matheny

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 790
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #16 on: December 23, 2022, 06:53:31 PM »
  Hey Chuck.  I bought a squeeze bottle
of carpenters glue at Home Despot for this
project.

  The trailing edge is 1/6" thick so I did the old
carpenter's trick of pinching a pencil and using
my finger as a guide as I pulled a line down the
T.E.
 
 

I bought a gallon of Titebond wood glue about 30 years ago for building ALL of the cabinets in my house plus 30 years worth of model plane building and still have 1/2 that jug. 
I'm ashamed to admit how much I've spent on CA over the years while working with wood glue could have gotten the job done..and in some cases done it better.
I do the "trailing edge pinch" with a fine line marker around all edges that I want to shape down to the mark on center and it's amazing how well that works...well at least "close enough for government work"...
The last few 1/2A biplane  builds I've done.....I used 1/8" bamboo skewers for the cabane / interplane struts and used a one foot long x 1/8 inch diameter drill bit in order to drill all the way from the top wing and into the bottom wing.
This method was quick and easy since the allignments can be made completely "true" before commiting to gluing anything

Offline Juan Valentin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • USAF 1969-73 ANG 73-77
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #17 on: December 24, 2022, 12:18:41 AM »
Hello Juan !

  It's good to hear from you.
Merry Christmas and I hope all is
good with you and yours.

  Yes! Don't clamp it in the vice
too tight !
As the picture shows, I didn't
rely on the drill press to thin the
shell down to where I wanted it.
  When we were kids we would just
glue it together as supplied. We didn't
know any better but they flew OK
anyway.
   I'm walking a line between reproducing
the plane I built back then and building
the new one correctly.
  When I thinned the log, I left extra meat
behind the firewall and at the wing root.

 Hello Keith
                            Merry Christmas and a Happy New year to you and your family too. I looked at your posted photos and you are doing a fine job. Sanding the wings to airfoil shape is not an easy job. I know that Sig Manufacturing has available airfoiled sheet balsa in  1/4 x 3 x 36 size and I`m going to order a few sheets to have around for making this small scientific models. The use of plywood for the cabane and wings struts is a great idea. I will continue to follow your build of the Little Stinker.
                               I received some original Scientific Little Bipe decals for my little bipe from Jimmy Dodson his email is biscotti54@gmail.com he might have some little Stinker decals to complement your model, contact him to find out.
                                                                                                                                                      Juan





Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #18 on: December 24, 2022, 08:31:23 AM »
Hey Chuck,
  Yes!  I discovered bamboo chop sticks
a couple of biplanes ago.  The elevators
on this Stinker are joined with a bamboo
tooth pick. Bamboo is tough stuff.

  Juan,

  You may have noticed that my M.O. is
to make as much as I can "in house".
It's mostly because I can't get exactly
what I want and I'm too impatient to
shop and wait for material.

  Those decals are amazing ! I assume
they are reproductions. (?)
  I will be rendering the sunbursts with dope.
I was looking at a Scientific ad from back
in the day. A usual "log" kit was $1.69.
The Stinker kit was $2.95. The extra expense
was probably for the decal sheet.
  It was a flashy looking little plane !   y1

  I will be covering the entire plane with
medium silkspan. It's lighter than
sanding sealer and adds a lot of strength.
Keith Morgan

Offline Juan Valentin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • USAF 1969-73 ANG 73-77
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #19 on: December 24, 2022, 06:55:40 PM »


  Juan,

  You may have noticed that my M.O. is
to make as much as I can "in house".
It's mostly because I can't get exactly
what I want and I'm too impatient to
shop and wait for material.

  Those decals are amazing ! I assume
they are reproductions. (?)
  I will be rendering the sunbursts with dope.
I was looking at a Scientific ad from back
in the day. A usual "log" kit was $1.69.
The Stinker kit was $2.95. The extra expense
was probably for the decal sheet.
  It was a flashy looking little plane !   y1

  I will be covering the entire plane with
medium silkspan. It's lighter than
sanding sealer and adds a lot of strength.


 Hello Keith
                           The decals I received are not reproductions. I agree with you the decals are extensive on this kit and painted sunburst will last a lot longer. It might be easier to paint all the parts after fitting everything together but before attaching them with glue. silkspan will give strenght and hide the wood grain. You are doing great. Here are some images of the kit that show the decals.
                                                                                                                                                                                 Juan



[/quote]

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #20 on: December 25, 2022, 04:40:00 AM »
Wow! 

Juan, that's an amazing picture
and a very nice Christmas gift.
Thank you.

   

 
Keith Morgan

Offline Juan Valentin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • USAF 1969-73 ANG 73-77
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #21 on: December 25, 2022, 09:38:49 AM »
Hello Keith
                             A  picture of Betty Skelton with the Pitts and a link to the Little Stinker on display at the Smithsonian Udvar Hazy facility.

https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/pitts-special-s-1c/nasm_A19850806000

                                                                                                                                                  Juan




Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #22 on: December 29, 2022, 06:32:40 AM »
Here's the Stinker "In the white".

  I like to cover my 1/2A's with medium
silkspan. It's picky work but it saves
a lot of weight and adds strength, plus
I can wet sand the surfaces and get a
really decent finish with just colored dope.

  My original Stinker had a new Baby Bee
so I have been digging through the
Big Box of Cox that was given to me at
the Brodak Fly-In. I polish the components
on a buffing wheel but finding a back plate
with the brass color intact is getting harder.

  I'm using a  #1 thin wall Tee Dee .049 cylinder
with dual booster ports on the bypass port
and a brand new regular glow head.
Much fancier than a normal Baby bee but
this plane deserves my better stuff.
Keith Morgan

Offline John Skukalek

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 143
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #23 on: December 29, 2022, 07:30:06 AM »
That's really cool Keith. I'm curious, how does using silk span save weight? 

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #24 on: December 29, 2022, 10:01:46 AM »
Hello John,

  The silkspan seals the grain of the balsa
with much less dope, and because it adds
strength I can use lighter wood. I also don't
need any filler for fillets or dings.
   In my experience, it's not as light as carbon
veil but it's stronger and easier to work with.

  I paint two coats of thinned nitrate on the
raw wood, sand with 500 grit, then apply
medium silkspan wet. I loosely cut the paper for each
area then dip it in water and drag it across my knee
to remove excess water. I dope through the wet
paper and it adheres well.
 I let it dry then apply two coats of buytrate.
One clear then one color.

  I know everyone here knows all this stuff,
but it doesn't hurt to say the obvious.

Cheers! - K.
Keith Morgan

Offline John Skukalek

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 143
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #25 on: December 29, 2022, 03:22:52 PM »
Thanks for explaining that Keith. Its very helpful for me. So without the silk span more dope/paint would be required and that would be heavier?

Online 944_Jim

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 849
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #26 on: December 29, 2022, 03:25:04 PM »
I'm digging this build!
Thanks for sharing.

Offline Chuck Matheny

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 790
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #27 on: December 29, 2022, 07:02:27 PM »
Thanks for explaining that Keith. Its very helpful for me. So without the silk span more dope/paint would be required and that would be heavier?

John...years down the road ...the wood that has been covered with tissue won't have the visible splits that paint over untissued wood tends to have.
Of course I've never owned an uncrashed model long enough to test this theory...
goozgog you are living the dream in style...spending  "Building Season" building balsa wood  planes while I'm stuck  mudding  and sanding plaster walls.
Very nice progress on the bipe btw.

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #28 on: January 01, 2023, 09:12:30 AM »
Hey Chuck.

  Yeah. I decided to put a new roof on the house
and rebuild the chimney before I allowed myself
to build another toy plane.

  I hate being an adult sometimes.  #^
Keith Morgan

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #29 on: January 01, 2023, 09:29:32 AM »
Happy New Year everyone !

  The "plans" at the top of this post are
the final version except that I'm planning
to draw the sunburst dimensions.

   Yes. Except for the red spats and nose,
all of that red was decal. I'm sure there
was some careful accounting done by
Scientific before they spent the cash.

  I just used LOTS of green painter's tape
to mask out the red. I'm using Brodak
Miss Ashley Red over Insignia White.
It's expensive dope but it handles beautifully.
I'm pleased with how sharp the edges are.
  I'm not clear coating this since I'm trying
to replicated my childhood plane.

  I decided to scrounge an original Scientific
bell crank and control horn. They aren't
very smooth or accurate but they are
original and authentic.

  I cut the windshield out of a Coke bottle
and stuck it on with E 6000 glue as recommended
by 944_Jim. This glue works great. Thanks Jim.
 I doubt it will stay on but I have to try.

  The kit came with a "cowl" which was just
a piece of white plastic sheet that was identical
to what could be cut from a Clorox bottle.
  It was impossible to keep attached then
and so it was an easy decision to leave it off.  y1

 
Keith Morgan

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #30 on: January 01, 2023, 09:43:18 AM »
  A serious shortcoming of this plane is
keeping the upper wing attached.
 The picture shows how I cut the cabanes
out of 1/16" ply instead of the hard balsa
that Scientific supplied. You can also see
the tabs that I used on both ends of the
interplane struts. I'm using carpenter's
PVA glue this time because it's slightly
flexible.
It can't possibly be worse than Ambroid
at keeping the wing and struts attached.

  The landing gear I made this time isn't
to the plans.  I don't think Walt expected
kids to actually make the pants and it's
obvious he didn't resolve exactly how
to keep everything attached.
  The picture shows that I sandwiched
the gear fairings onto the wire and that
they aren't attached to the fuselage.
The L/G wire needs to bend so I'm sure
my efforts are hopeless, but it sure
looks good to me!
  I still need to find wheel collars to
hold the pants and wheels.


   Cheers! - K.
Keith Morgan

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #31 on: January 01, 2023, 10:46:26 AM »
  For what It's worth this Little Stinker
weighs 5.7 oz .
 Not too bad for a log.

Total wing area is 83.375 Sq/inches.

For comparison :

FormFlite Thunderbolt is 4.7 oz
also with a Baby Bee.

https://stunthanger.com/smf/12-a-building/top-flight-form-flight-thunderbolt-18'/msg519580/#msg519580

Cox Spitfire replica is 7.2 Oz with a Silver Bee
I haven't calculated the wing area.

https://stunthanger.com/smf/12-a-building/cox-spitfire-replica-build-flight-video/msg380034/#msg380034

The Focke-Wulf was an exercise in weight management
so it's very light and not really a good comparison.
Weight 8.8oz and Wing Area of 207 square inches.

https://stunthanger.com/smf/12-a-building/focke-wulf-190d-stunter-build/msg543727/#msg543727
Keith Morgan

Online 944_Jim

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 849
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #32 on: January 01, 2023, 03:36:36 PM »
Hubba hubba hubba! That looks just like Scientific would have built to showcase the kit to little, newspaper slinging fingers sixty years ago.

I applaud your build with a standing ovation, Sir! H^^

Offline Chuck Matheny

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 790
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #33 on: January 01, 2023, 08:26:49 PM »
Hey Chuck.

  Yeah. I decided to put a new roof on the house
and rebuild the chimney before I allowed myself
to build another toy plane.

  I hate being an adult sometimes.  #^

.....and being a MODEL AIRPLANE GUY did you drill  .005" interference fit pilots holes for all the roofing nails...? H^^
 

Offline Chuck Matheny

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 790
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #34 on: January 01, 2023, 08:29:54 PM »
  A serious shortcoming of this plane is
keeping the upper wing attached.
 The picture shows how I cut the cabanes
out of 1/16" ply instead of the hard balsa
that Scientific supplied. You can also see
the tabs that I used on both ends of the
interplane struts. I'm using carpenter's
PVA glue this time because it's slightly
flexible.
It can't possibly be worse than Ambroid
at keeping the wing and struts attached.

  The landing gear I made this time isn't
to the plans.  I don't think Walt expected
kids to actually make the pants and it's
obvious he didn't resolve exactly how
to keep everything attached.
  The picture shows that I sandwiched
the gear fairings onto the wire and that
they aren't attached to the fuselage.
The L/G wire needs to bend so I'm sure
my efforts are hopeless, but it sure
looks good to me!
  I still need to find wheel collars to
hold the pants and wheels.


   Cheers! - K.

WOW...!
A masterful job of doing the layout and then masking  it without any leaks...!!
The paint job itself is just secondary to all that prep work...!!
Oh yeah..the handy dandy thrust calculator suggests that  if you can get good  output from your .049 you ought to have a 2 to 1 ratio to do the stunt pattern with.
https://spencergoesflying.net/hosted/static_thrust/   H^^

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: Musciano Little Stinker 16" Scientific
« Reply #35 on: January 01, 2023, 10:21:39 PM »
"Hubba Hubba Hubba !"

Geeze Jim. I'm dying here. LL~
Keith Morgan


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here