News:


  • April 24, 2024, 04:33:18 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Another Mid-70’s engine question.  (Read 926 times)

Offline Mark Mc

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 719
Another Mid-70’s engine question.
« on: September 25, 2020, 09:44:01 AM »
I was just reading the Gremlin 1/2A pattern plane article in the May ’75 issue of Model Builder by Tom Dixon, and it says the plane flies on a Cox “stunt special” engine.  The “stunt special” is a TD .049 with a Babe Bee piston/cylinder and a low compression glow head, a Kirn-Kraft NVA, and turning a Cox 6x4 prop on 5% nitro fuel from a Perfect wedge tank.  Tom says this pulls the 12 ounce model through the entire stunt pattern.  The KK fine needle would be the only thing I would have associated with “performance”.  A low compression head topping a single bypass/no boost cylinder with SPI doesn’t scream “performance”.  5% nitro on a 1/2A doesn’t scream “performance”.  A TD on suction from a standard plumbed wedge tank doesn’t scream performance.  And a Cox 6x4 doesn’t scream “performance” (unless you’re propping for torque).  And we all know Cox TD engines were made to scream.

What exactly am I missing on this?

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3997
Re: Another Mid-70’s engine question.
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2020, 10:01:52 AM »
Sound all wrong to me! I went the other way with a Medallion bottom end and Tee Dee top. 15% Nitro. Great runs!
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline John Given

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 67
Re: Another Mid-70’s engine question.
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2020, 02:05:04 PM »
Sound all wrong to me! I went the other way with a Medallion bottom end and Tee Dee top. 15% Nitro. Great runs!

This is what I’d do.

Offline 944_Jim

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 854
Re: Another Mid-70’s engine question.
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2020, 08:02:46 AM »
Oh, why did I see this? This plane is cute.  Now I want to build one! For all the concern about tail weight, I wonder how it would be scaled up about 5-8%, and flying a Norvel Big Mig .061.

Thanks for the tease.

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3997
Re: Another Mid-70’s engine question.
« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2020, 08:20:45 PM »
Go with it as is and just fly on longer lines. You’l love it.
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Online Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13737
Re: Another Mid-70’s engine question.
« Reply #5 on: September 28, 2020, 08:24:59 PM »
Sound all wrong to me! I went the other way with a Medallion bottom end and Tee Dee top. 15% Nitro. Great runs!

  Indeed, your method sounds a lot more plausible, the last things you want is to lower the compression or run the TD intake system

    Brett

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3997
Re: Another Mid-70’s engine question.
« Reply #6 on: September 28, 2020, 08:33:10 PM »
Nothing wrong with the Tee Dee in take system, it is the wild Tee Dee crank timing! A Tee Dee with a Medallion crank shoUld run just fine as a stunt engine, it is just easier to grab the entire Medallion bottom end. (Especially if you work in the factory 🤭)
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here