News:



  • April 20, 2024, 10:39:00 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: clown  (Read 6008 times)

Offline bob whitney

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 2248
clown
« on: July 07, 2016, 04:13:56 PM »


 how many laps Per tank  are the OS 18's getting on the 60 ft lines???  and for the 7.5 heat
rad racer

Offline bill bischoff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1702
Re: clown
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2016, 06:54:30 PM »
Bill Lee and I hold the record with an OS 18. I think it's 154 laps, but you can look it up. If I remember correctly, we get 43-46 laps per tank. Bill Lee can set me straight if it's different than that.

BB

Offline BillLee

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
Re: clown
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2016, 07:22:38 PM »
Bill Lee and I hold the record with an OS 18. I think it's 154 laps, but you can look it up. If I remember correctly, we get 43-46 laps per tank. Bill Lee can set me straight if it's different than that.

BB

That's about right.
Bill Lee
AMA 20018

Offline bob whitney

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 2248
Re: clown
« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2016, 09:06:56 PM »


 thanks
rad racer

Offline bob whitney

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 2248
Re: clown
« Reply #4 on: July 08, 2016, 06:20:19 PM »


thats 154 laps on 60 ft lines right??
rad racer

Offline bill bischoff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1702
Re: clown
« Reply #5 on: July 08, 2016, 09:28:51 PM »
Yes, 60 feet. It's actually 150 laps; I looked it up.

BB

Offline Jim Carter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 953
Re: clown
« Reply #6 on: July 09, 2016, 11:39:33 AM »
 ???  Wait .... hold on .... am I understanding this correctly??  You're stating that someone flew 150 laps with an OS 18 for power using a Clown  ??? ???  Please, was this non-stop??  What size fuel tank was being used??  Thanks in advance. :)

Jim Carter
Titusville, FL 

Offline bob whitney

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 2248
Re: clown
« Reply #7 on: July 09, 2016, 12:22:58 PM »

so 160 should be good ?? S?P

7.5 minutes time limit one oz tank, 43-45 laps per tank
rad racer

Offline BillLee

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
Re: clown
« Reply #8 on: July 09, 2016, 03:53:27 PM »
Yah, that would be good.
Bill Lee
AMA 20018

Offline BillLee

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
Re: clown
« Reply #9 on: July 09, 2016, 03:57:27 PM »
???  Wait .... hold on .... am I understanding this correctly??  You're stating that someone flew 150 laps with an OS 18 for power using a Clown  ??? ???  Please, was this non-stop??  What size fuel tank was being used??  Thanks in advance. :)

Jim Carter
Titusville, FL 

Yes, 150 laps in 7.5 minutes. 1 ounce tank, 45+/- laps per tank. Air speed right around 18-flat, perhaps a bit better. Usually three pit stops plus a start, all have to be good.

Bill Lee
AMA 20018

Offline Jim Carter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 953
Re: clown
« Reply #10 on: July 11, 2016, 09:54:29 AM »
Yes, 150 laps in 7.5 minutes. 1 ounce tank, 45+/- laps per tank. Air speed right around 18-flat, perhaps a bit better. Usually three pit stops plus a start, all have to be good.


In the words and voice of Gomer Pyle ..... Well Gollllllllllllllllllllllllly!!!  I'm happy ta' git 3 laps in three minutes on three ounces!!

Offline Motorman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 3257
Re: clown
« Reply #11 on: July 12, 2016, 09:40:11 AM »
  What size fuel tank was being used?

That's what the world wants to know lol.


MM

Offline BillLee

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
Re: clown
« Reply #12 on: July 12, 2016, 10:06:09 AM »
That's what the world wants to know lol.


MM

No, Walt, only YOU want to know! The WORLD is quite happy that the models flown somewhere besides your backyard are legal.

Come on down to Muncie next Monday and measure the tanks for us!

Oh! But that would mean you'd have to stop questioning people's honesty!
Bill Lee
AMA 20018

Offline Ken Burdick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
Re: clown
« Reply #13 on: July 14, 2016, 04:44:48 PM »
Don't mean to break up your Bromance here guys, but check this out. I just got some cool pictures of Bob W's Nats entry in Clown. Looks like a bucks up and serious project.

Offline bill bischoff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1702
Re: clown
« Reply #14 on: July 15, 2016, 07:52:32 AM »
We'll know soon enough...

Offline Ken Burdick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
Re: clown
« Reply #15 on: July 15, 2016, 09:44:07 AM »
with Bill's help, I was able to get my Nelson RIRE clown project to 80+ mph and 99 laps. It wasn't as serious a project as this one but the fuel assistance from Bill took it into the record area after we figured out the heat management.

Offline BillLee

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
Re: clown
« Reply #16 on: July 15, 2016, 01:28:24 PM »
with Bill's help, I was able to get my Nelson RIRE clown project to 80+ mph and 99 laps. It wasn't as serious a project as this one but the fuel assistance from Bill took it into the record area after we figured out the heat management.

Looks like 80mph at 99 laps would yield right around 148-150 laps on 52' lines.
Bill Lee
AMA 20018

Offline Motorman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 3257
Re: clown
« Reply #17 on: July 21, 2016, 06:14:14 PM »
LOL, my frenemies, I knew just where to kick him, sooo sorry.


MM



Offline Paul Smith

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 5800
Re: clown
« Reply #18 on: July 21, 2016, 08:16:36 PM »
Looks like 80mph at 99 laps would yield right around 148-150 laps on 52' lines.



99 laps is a waste of fuel.  You would be flying 50 laps after the race.   It would be better to go for 80 laps and more speed.  Then you could get 160 laps with an even two tankfuls.

Paul Smith

Offline BillLee

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
Re: clown
« Reply #19 on: July 22, 2016, 05:21:52 AM »


99 laps is a waste of fuel.  You would be flying 50 laps after the race.   It would be better to go for 80 laps and more speed.  Then you could get 160 laps with an even two tankfuls.



(Good grief, the errors in the original post! I'm amazed Walt hasn't called me on it! :-) )

Quite true, Paul. In order to get 160 laps at 80/tank, you will have to have a Clown running at about 18.8 for 7laps.

Assume 5 seconds lost on first lap, 15 seconds lost for a pit stop (an EXCELLENT pit stop!) leaves 215 seconds for 80 laps (Oops! Originally said 5 instead of 15.)

7.5 minutes is 450 seconds
450 - 5 - 15 = 430 for the airtime for two tanks
430 / 160 = 2.6875 seconds/lap
18.8125 seconds for 7 laps


 18.8 for 80 laps is a TOUGH combination!

The way to get more laps is to go faster AND further at the same time.

As simple as Clown seems to be, it is a tough event to master.

Except when you only fly in your own imagination!  ::)

===================================================

PS: The only way to correctly measure the effect of the start and/or a pit stop is to measure the 7-laps from a standing start or 7-laps with a pit stop in the middle, and then subtract a 7-lap time at normal speed. The result is what the start or the pit stop "cost" you. Takes all of the factors (decelleration, actual on-the-ground time, accelleration) into account.
« Last Edit: July 23, 2016, 11:41:09 AM by BillLee »
Bill Lee
AMA 20018

Offline Ken Burdick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
Re: clown
« Reply #20 on: July 23, 2016, 09:33:34 AM »
sorry for the bad info guys. After the help from Bill, it was 89 - 90 mph with the 99 laps. That was the best we could get from the project. I think it started out around 79 mph at 60 laps but running an open faced RIRE has its challenges.
The prop it seemed to like best was an APC 6.5 x 5? been several years. When it was right, it seemed to be pretty strong, when it was not it was awful.

K


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here