News:



  • April 19, 2024, 12:13:11 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: IC v. Electric and props  (Read 1552 times)

Offline peabody

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2867
IC v. Electric and props
« on: February 17, 2017, 06:38:22 AM »
Reading the "retracts" thread, which morphed into commentary/opinion of TC v. electric power.....good stuff there....

I have paid a lot of attention to prop selection by fliers of IC power....and have read the virtues of large v. smaller diameters and heard top fliers rail about proper prop pitch....

I have watched Windy fly back to back to back....flights changing the prop on each....

Prop pitch in 1/10th degree increments has been discussed.....

Yet, when power is from a battery, the instructions seem to be "just speed it up".......

IC engines are capable of being sped up as well, but that is poo-pooed.....

Just curious....

 

Offline Target

  • C/L Addict
  • 2019 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1692
Re: IC v. Electric and props
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2017, 08:00:00 AM »
I like them both.
Electric as cleaner and more trouble free, but IC as safer and more "traditional".
I'm fortunate to have a buddy that has made my IC engines extremely trouble free. They run great. I also believe that generally, after a little input from him, I have the right idea on how to approach troubleshooting run problems in general.
So in the end, I like them both!
I'm getting ready try a new prop on my e powered plane. It's currently running an e-apc, but I will try an e-xoar prop. It's lighter, and I'm sure I'll feel a difference. May have to speed up the motor, it's a 5 pitch vice 6 on the apc.
R,
Chris
Regards,
Chris
AMA 5956

Offline Dave_Trible

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6146
Re: IC v. Electric and props
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2017, 08:04:05 AM »
Rich I'll offer my own reasonings about IC needle settings , especially with a piped set up.  You surely CAN twist the needle some to set speed but it can take a while to find an rpm/pipe/ fuel consumption/ front to back lap timing scheme that gets you in your desired speed ballpark and get the 'breaks' occurring at the desired time and place. When you move the needle much it messes up some or all your program.  Slight prop pitch changes will have very dramatic impact on airspeed without cause havoc elsewhere.  Also larger diameter props can cause larger airplane trim issues and greater variances when you do change pitch.  Another aspect is in strong winds the prop has a 'braking' property which moderates wind up.  If you twist the needle in more, at a point the engine my 'take-off' or accelerate compounding rather than helping with wind up. Running a smaller diameter also helps keep a monster motor running in or basing in a four cycle which also prevents the dreaded wind up.  Larger props cause more load on the engine and usually demands more two stroking,  at least in .76 terms. Once you've got your program figured out and through a bunch of regular practice flying it all becomes pretty simple and very repeatable and predictable.

Dave
AMA 20934
FAA Certificate FA3ATY4T94

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13732
Re: IC v. Electric and props
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2017, 09:59:18 AM »
Reading the "retracts" thread, which morphed into commentary/opinion of TC v. electric power.....good stuff there....

I have paid a lot of attention to prop selection by fliers of IC power....and have read the virtues of large v. smaller diameters and heard top fliers rail about proper prop pitch....

I have watched Windy fly back to back to back....flights changing the prop on each....

Prop pitch in 1/10th degree increments has been discussed.....

Yet, when power is from a battery, the instructions seem to be "just speed it up".......

IC engines are capable of being sped up as well, but that is poo-pooed.....

Just curious....

 

   The difference with electric is that changing the pitch (or the load in other ways) doesn't have the same effect on electric that it does on an engine. With an engine you have to concern yourself with the feedback it provides, and where it puts the engine WRT the "setting"', for lack of a better word. Changing the speed on an electric is closer to changing the venturi diameter than it is the needle. You tweak the needle in, it goes faster but it also goes leaner, you add prop drag, it slows down and goes "leaner". Add venturi diameter, and it goes faster, and you hold the same mixture (more fuel, but also more air) but the effects of the changing prop drag in the maneuvers also gets more dramatic. If the prop drags the engine RPM down, your fuel suction goes down, and it generally goes leaner - which is about 3/4 the effect of the effect that causes a 4-2 break, also why you get a power change effect even if it goes from a medium 2 to a lean 2 like the 20FP.

    Look at the effect of the Berringer-style venturi on a 4-stroke. Instead of trying to adjust it with the needle, you adjust the screw (which is like a narrow-range, very finely controlled throttle, without all the crudity and leaks of a conventional RC carb) and change the choke area. You would like to do the same thing on a PA75, if you didn't have to take it apart to change it.

    Big Jim was telling people more-or-less the same thing 35 years ago - the needle is not a throttle. It's great for *small* adjustments because realistically, that's all you have on a conventional engine, but anything more than a small tweak, and you probably want to change the venturi, compression, or the nitro, which have similar effects for any big change.

    The very best engine setup have the interesting effect of going "flat" when you get the needle a little lean, or getting more responsive if you are a little slow on the needle. Too fast/lean overall and the speed is fast, but it picks up less boost in the maneuvers, so it tends to minimize the feeling of speed in the maneuvers. Too slow/rich, and it's slow overall, but has more boost in the maneuvers to provide adequate line tension to get through. One of the reasons tuned pipe engines are so much more repeatable and insensitive to conditions is that you have to count much less on venturi and other feedback effects -  because you have a very good regulator in the exhaust tuning, which works more like an electric RPM governor rather the complex relationships involved in 4-2 break engines.

      Brett

Offline Howard Rush

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7811
Re: IC v. Electric and props
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2017, 12:00:31 PM »
This reminds me of a kid who was asked his impression of his first aerobatic airplane ride.  "In inside loops, my cheeks went down.  It outside loops my cheeks went up", he said.  Since Dave and Brett answered your actual question with technical stuff, I'll give you my impressions of prop differences between electric and IC, which is kinda like the kid's answer.  First, I was amazed that electrics could get away with such wimpy props.  My other observation was that you pick electric props so you can't hear corners. 
The Jive Combat Team
Making combat and stunt great again

Offline Ted Fancher

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2326
Re: IC v. Electric and props
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2017, 10:29:30 PM »
  My other observation was that you pick electric props so you can't hear corners. 

Not sure how you do that but it is a really good idea!  I remember those aural corner buzzsaw sounds jumping out at me when I had to run pull tests at the nats one year and watched/listened to all the finals flights.  Every e-shape mistake was like a dog barking whenever he wanted you to look at him being a bad boy.  Same thing is there with IC ships but largely muffled by the ambient engine noise.  The electrics were shouting "mistake, ding me"  "'nother mistake, ding me again".

Ted

Offline RandySmith

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 13747
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
    • Aero Products
Re: IC v. Electric and props
« Reply #6 on: February 19, 2017, 12:47:39 PM »
Not sure how you do that but it is a really good idea!  I remember those aural corner buzzsaw sounds jumping out at me when I had to run pull tests at the nats one year and watched/listened to all the finals flights.  Every e-shape mistake was like a dog barking whenever he wanted you to look at him being a bad boy.  Same thing is there with IC ships but largely muffled by the ambient engine noise.  The electrics were shouting "mistake, ding me"  "'nother mistake, ding me again".

Ted

I have flown quite a few of them that buzz  in the corners, you also feel a large vibration, or buzz, in the  handle when that happens on electric models, and if you watch closely you can see the  prop edge get much wider.. this is caused by the prop blades flexing/fluttering ,  interesting sight, that you can see many times while flying the corners

Randy

Offline Howard Rush

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7811
Re: IC v. Electric and props
« Reply #7 on: February 19, 2017, 01:05:39 PM »
I have flown quite a few of them that buzz  in the corners, you also feel a large vibration, or buzz, in the  handle when that happens on electric models, and if you watch closely you can see the  prop edge get much wider.. this is caused by the prop blades flexing/fluttering ,  interesting sight, that you can see many times while flying the corners

Randy

A wimpy prop may not disintegrate on an electric airplane, but may still have other issues.
The Jive Combat Team
Making combat and stunt great again

Offline RandySmith

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 13747
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
    • Aero Products
Re: IC v. Electric and props
« Reply #8 on: February 19, 2017, 06:35:47 PM »
A wimpy prop may not disintegrate on an electric airplane, but may still have other issues.

Yes, also can be a problem in turbulent air, and I see the same in high winds when the plane gets loaded up, and some when the plane gets   fast airspeed while maneuvering in high winds, especially  hard bottoms and parts where the wind tries  to whip up the plane

Randy


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here