News:



  • April 23, 2024, 06:05:57 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Engine information ST 60 vs KB 61  (Read 1047 times)

Offline David M Johnson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 245
Engine information ST 60 vs KB 61
« on: February 26, 2015, 08:52:15 PM »
I was reading Frank Williams article and plans for a profile Bearcat and realized I have a almost new ST 60 RC and a KB 61 that is also used. I was hoping to get peoples thoughts on the better engine for that project.
Thank you in advance for your thoughts and for your opinions. 
We're havin some fun now!!

Offline Motorman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 3260
Re: Engine information ST 60 vs KB 61
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2015, 10:33:41 PM »
I would dare say the SuperTiger would be infinitely better.


MM

Offline frank williams

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 831
Re: Engine information ST 60 vs KB 61
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2015, 10:48:38 PM »
David,
ST60 for sure .... or a RO Jett .67  .... K&B 61 , not so much   ...... I've tried 4 cycle's but they shake too much for the thin fuselage.

Offline Randy Cuberly

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3674
Re: Engine information ST 60 vs KB 61
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2015, 10:51:01 PM »
I would dare say the SuperTiger would be infinitely better.


MM

I don't agree that "the Super Tigre" would be infinitely better.  I do agree that the Super Tigre would probably be a little better because it's about 1 oz lighter, and more parts IE mufflers etc are available for it.

The K&B 61's run is almost indistinguishable from the K&B in terms of power and type of run.

If you are not bothered by the extra oz of weight of the K&B, they could be considered interchangeable.

I have considerable run time in the past on both engines!

However as Frank says, if you want to spring for a RO Jett 67 (or 61 for that matter) that is the better choice over either of the others, because they aren't "paint shakers" like the other two engines and definitely have more potential power.  They do of course have a diferent style of run with slightly flatter pitched props and somewhat higher RPM.

Randy Cuberly
Randy Cuberly
Tucson, AZ

John Leidle

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Engine information ST 60 vs KB 61
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2015, 01:20:11 AM »
   I've run both like they say the K&B is an ounce heavier . Power is similar the Tiger might be a touch stronger . 

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3415
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Re: Engine information ST 60 vs KB 61
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2015, 03:15:06 AM »
<Snip> I've tried 4 cycle's but they shake too much for the thin fuselage.

Keep seeing this said and I sure do not understand it. My Saito 56/62's certainly do not shake any more than a ST 60 and I know first hand the Saito 40 shakes a whole lot less than an OS 35S.

Offline Bill Little

  • 2017
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12671
  • Second in COMMAND
Re: Engine information ST 60 vs KB 61
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2015, 05:34:33 AM »
Hi David,

I would go with the ST .60 that you have IF it is the light case "V" .60, not the Blue Head. The light case is about 1 oz lighter than the K&B like has been said.  If it is the Blue Head ST, then use the K&B .61.

BIG Bear
RNMM/AMM
Big Bear <><

Aberdeen, NC

James Hylton Motorsports/NASCAR/ARCA

AMA 95351 (got one of my old numbers back! ;D )

Trying to get by

Offline frank williams

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 831
Re: Engine information ST 60 vs KB 61
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2015, 09:31:21 AM »
I mentioned the RO Jett 67 cause I've been running it some through the winter to pass the time, and it is, I my opinion, the best of the ROJett's.  The engine is truly "undersquare" (small bore long stroke) .... not many of them around.  I'm just running it with a header muffler, not piped.   I'm told that the Retro 61 is undersquare ... never had one though.

Offline Carl Cisneros

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 890
Re: Engine information ST 60 vs KB 61
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2015, 10:18:43 AM »
For what it's worth

I would vote for the K&B (that is just me)
I like the way they run, parts are available from MECOA, The mufflers that fit the V cased Tigres FIT the K&B (I just use the ones that RSM sells for the Super Tigre 60 and they bolt right on).
The K&B IS 1oz heavier that the Tigre, but I just like the K&B.

Again, this is just my preference.
Carl R Cisneros, Dist IV
Control Line RB


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here