News:



  • March 28, 2024, 07:02:58 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body  (Read 6173 times)

Offline dagored

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • **
  • Posts: 36
plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« on: November 25, 2014, 09:22:59 PM »
used a plastic tank with clunker inside on a sig Banchee profile motor is an old fox .35 no muffler and it seems the clunker in the tank cant keep up when the fuel gets less then half full when your doing stunts , the tank is a 4oz . just getting back into control line after 20 + yrs , should i just put a 4 oz wedge tank on it.....Thanks

Offline bob whitney

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2244
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2014, 10:06:42 PM »
 sounds like the fuel line is too stiff, find a softer fuel line
rad racer

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12804
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2014, 10:40:04 PM »
The clunk should touch, or almost touch, the outer wall of the tank when the plane is held with the wings vertical.  If you have a Hayes tank and this is not happening then your line is too stiff.  If you have a DuBro or Sullivan tank, then either your line is too stiff or (particularly if you have a slant tank) the brass tubes are not bent correctly.

I've never been fully satisfied with regular tanks -- even the metal tanks that find their way into my airplanes end up being clunk tanks.  Clunk tanks can and do work very well.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Bootlegger

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2710
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2014, 09:01:30 AM »

 In this regard, where can a fellow buy some soft tubing that works well in a clunk tank.

 I have tried the Sullivan web site, but can't get info on softer tubing.  Where else to find some sure would help.
8th Air Force Veteran
Gil Causey
AMA# 6964

Offline Jim Kraft

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3411
  • AMA78415
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #4 on: November 26, 2014, 12:43:08 PM »
Back in my early R/C days we use to use surgical tubing as it is very flexible. The only thing is it does deteriorate pretty fast, and also will let the clunk go forward in a hard landing. We fixed that by using only a short piece of it to a length of brass tubing and the the clunk fixed to the end of the brass tubing with another piece of regular silicone tubing. That all worked pretty well as long as you changed out the surgical tubing every so often. I have not had much luck with plastic tanks myself on profile C/L models as I always seem to move the tubes one way or the other when fueling with my ham hands and it changes the motor run. They seem to work well for others though.
Jim Kraft

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12804
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #5 on: November 26, 2014, 01:54:10 PM »
In this regard, where can a fellow buy some soft tubing that works well in a clunk tank.

 I have tried the Sullivan web site, but can't get info on softer tubing.  Where else to find some sure would help.

I look for silicone tubing that's one size smaller in diameter than what I'd use externally.  If there's a choice between thick wall and thin I go thin.

Remember that the stuff just needs to traverse the outside edge of the tank from top to bottom -- if the fuel isn't being thrown to someplace on that outside wall, then something is wrong with the plane.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Jim Kraft

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3411
  • AMA78415
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #6 on: November 26, 2014, 01:58:24 PM »
Does it shut off and then restart? Might just be the Fox burp instead of the tank.
Jim Kraft

Offline dagored

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • **
  • Posts: 36
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #7 on: November 26, 2014, 02:38:39 PM »
I just think the clunk can't keep up with the fuel....... D>K

Offline Phil Krankowski

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1031

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12804
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #9 on: November 26, 2014, 02:48:59 PM »
I didn't register the fact that you're running a Fox 35.  I think you'll be very happy if you shorten the nose and change out the engine to an OS 46 LA (best), Magnum 36, Tower 40, OS 40 LA (probably good, but some people hate 'em), OS 40 FP, etc.  You'll need to run 'em the way they like, but when you do that they're much nicer than the Fox.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline dagored

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • **
  • Posts: 36
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #10 on: November 26, 2014, 04:32:21 PM »
shorten the nose and how much do i cut off , i could use a new 40 fp OS that i have of cores the OS 40 Fp with muffler weights much more than the old fox with no muffler .........

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12804
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #11 on: November 26, 2014, 04:45:52 PM »
shorten the nose and how much do i cut off , i could use a new 40 fp OS that i have of cores the OS 40 Fp with muffler weights much more than the old fox with no muffler .........

Shorten the nose enough so that the big heavy 40 FP balances the same as the Fox, of course!

I'd do it by experimentation: take off the Fox, put a prop and muffler on the 40 FP (APC 11.5 x 4, or a ThunderTiger 11x4.5), then rubber-band the thing to the fuselage.  Move it back and forth until it balances.  As long as there's meat to drill through in the motor mounts, you're ready to rock & roll.

If that sounds like too much work, just fix up the tank and fly it with the Fox -- but build the next one for the 40 FP.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline dagored

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • **
  • Posts: 36
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #12 on: November 26, 2014, 04:57:19 PM »
I might just do that .....thanks

Offline John Kelly

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 213
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #13 on: November 26, 2014, 10:06:49 PM »
   ...Weight of engine times nose length = X. X divided by weight of new engine = new nose length.   Cheers,   John
AMA 11416

Offline dagored

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • **
  • Posts: 36
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #14 on: November 26, 2014, 10:34:12 PM »
Thanks John....

Offline dagored

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • **
  • Posts: 36
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #15 on: November 26, 2014, 10:36:51 PM »
Thanks to all ,  Have a Great Thanks Giving

Offline kenneth cook

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1464
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #16 on: November 27, 2014, 04:52:19 AM »
               Your description of can't keep up is somewhat vague. Is the clunk getting hung up on the side wall of the tank? Loosen the stopper screw and holding the neck cocked to the opposite side and re tighten. It may not hurt to pull the pickup line forward slightly. It sounds as if the clunk is floating up and out of the fuel and then the engine is leaning out and quitting. I would also consider shimming your tank out in the rear approx 1/4" with a scrap of balsa. Sullivan makes a larger clunk which can be most helpful. In addition, Dubro makes a sintered bronze clunk which is not only heavier than the standard brass clunk but it also prevent bubbles which can make runs on a profile most problematic. I certainly don't feel your plagued with a engine problem. While the hard tin tank may work, they don't come without issues at times as well. Ken

Offline dagored

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • **
  • Posts: 36
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #17 on: November 27, 2014, 08:05:15 AM »
Shimming of tank thats a good idea  , Thanks Ken

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12804
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #18 on: November 27, 2014, 09:54:44 AM »
I'm probably repeating myself, but the important part of getting a clunk tank set up is to test it on the ground.  On or off the plane, hold the tank so that the outside surface (the surface that points to the outside of the circle) is down.  Then tilt the tank lengthwise.  You should be able to see where the clunk is, and you should be able to see that it is (a) riding on that outside surface, and (b) smoothly riding to both rear corners as you tilt the tank.  If you don't see that, figure out what's wrong and fix it.  Sometimes it's stiff tubing, but sometimes it's the various other problems mentioned (I often start by cutting the tubing a bit long, so the clunk hangs up on the rear edge of the tank, and must be shortened).
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Russell Shaffer

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1333
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #19 on: November 27, 2014, 08:02:38 PM »
I'm not trying to insult anyone, but are you absolutely sure the clunk is at the back of the tank?  A hard landing or any kind of a nose plant can flop the clunk to the front of the tank.  Then the airplane will run fine and even take off but not for long.  Ask me how I learned this lesson.
Russell Shaffer
Klamath Falls, Oregon
Just North of the California border

Offline Steve Helmick

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 9920
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #20 on: November 27, 2014, 10:58:42 PM »
Dirty Dan even found out that storing the plane nose-down was enough to put the clunk up front and mess up the first flight of the day...the one where you find out something just ain't right.

I'll do my part by suggesting (strongly) that the Hayes plastic tanks are foolproof and reliable as a tank can be. Whether to mount it "foot" down or "foot" against the fuselage is a bit of a problem. Foot down is just the way they're mounted in R/C planes. Foot against the fuselage makes it more difficult to fill with fuel. They are simple to assemble and more leak-proof than others, from my experience.  y1 Steve
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12804
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #21 on: November 28, 2014, 09:00:26 AM »
I'll do my part by suggesting (strongly) that the Hayes plastic tanks are foolproof and reliable as a tank can be. Whether to mount it "foot" down or "foot" against the fuselage is a bit of a problem. Foot down is just the way they're mounted in R/C planes. Foot against the fuselage makes it more difficult to fill with fuel. They are simple to assemble and more leak-proof than others, from my experience.  y1 Steve

I'll second that.  The plug-style tanks can be made to work well if you know what you're doing and if you're careful.  The Hayes tanks just work, period.  I mount 'em foot down, and they work fine for me.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline dagored

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • **
  • Posts: 36
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #22 on: November 28, 2014, 12:06:11 PM »
OK foot down , what do you mean foot down ?.......... %^@

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12804
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #23 on: November 28, 2014, 12:56:00 PM »
If you look at a picture of a Hayes tank it'll be obvious.  They're molded with a "foot" at the bottom.

http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXK827&P=ML

AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline dagored

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • **
  • Posts: 36
Re: plastic fuel tanks on profile or full body
« Reply #24 on: November 28, 2014, 01:51:52 PM »
Ok i see ..........


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here