AERO TIGER 36 VS OSLA46S

[Guy B Jr]

I would like info on comparing the Aero Tiger 36 to the LA46S; as to power, usability, etc. Planes to be used with either engine go from a Nobler, Vector 40, and Gieseke Nobler component kit up to a Brodak Cardinal or a Cardinal Evolution 40. I have several of the engines, so purchase is not a problem.

[Brett Buck]

I would like info on comparing the Aero Tiger 36 to the LA46S; as to power, usability, etc. Planes to be used with either engine go from a Nobler, Vector 40, and Gieseke Nobler component kit up to a Brodak Cardinal or a Cardinal Evolution 40. I have several of the engines, so purchase is not a problem.

   I would use an Aero Tiger in any of those.

    Brett

[Randy Cuberly]

I'm a big fan of the OS LA46 and think they are likely the best stunt engine around for anything like what they cost.  They will turn a bigger prop than the Aero Tiger but none of the airplanes you mentioned need that.

So, for the airplanes you mentioned I would also choose the Aero Tiger to use if they were available to me.  It's tough to beat the consistency of the run and overall reliability of the Aero Tiger.  They will likely outlast the LA46 two to one or more.  Also some of the airplanes you named would likely require a little tail weight to balance the LA46.

I would say however if I had an LA46 and didn't have an Aerotiger I would not worry about it I would simply use the LA, and not really be handicapped.

If you were using airplanes in the 50 to 56 oz range then the LA46 would in my opinion, have a distinct advantage with a larger prop.

However others may disagree!

Randy Cuberly

[Brian Massey]

I have several LA 46 engines and love them! Great stunt engine at a great price. I have one currently on a 60 oz plane swinging a 12 1/4 prop with ease. But they are heavy. No experience with the Aero Tiger, so no comment. But, the Brodak 40 is a good strong engine and light weight to boot. I have one in a 43 oz plane swinging an 11 1/2 inch prop with ease.

Personally, I think the LA 46 is a bit of overkill and too heavy for a Nobler size plane.

Brian

[Paul Taylor]

John Simpson !

Enough said.

IMHO. 

[Guy B Jr]

Guys,
Thanks for the replies.

The original question states that I already owned the engines. Please give opinions along that context. Thanks.

[Steve Helmick]

Both are pretty wonderful engines. Both will start easily and run very well. Actually, both will be very happy on the TT Cyclone 11 x 4.5 prop. I'd say that if you're still crashing occasionally, you'd be better off using the .46LA. If you're past the crashing phase, then either will work really well. Certainly, weight (and size) matters for smaller Classic models.

I launched Pete Peterson's AT .36 powered "Caprice" frequently over a season or more, and was always impressed with the easy starting and excellent power. Last Memorial Day weekend in Salem, I launched Bob Duncan's AT .36 powered "Imitation" several times. That's a really big airplane for a .36, but it hauled it very well, and always after a 1 flip start. It seems to me that he flew it in both Profile and Advanced, but I could be wrong on that. I'm pretty sure I launched it more than a couple of flights and always 1 flip starts. I can't imagine a sweeter combination than a G-Nobler and an AT .36.   Steve  

[Randy Cuberly]

(clip)
I launched Pete Peterson's AT .36 powered "Capris" frequently over a season or more, and was always impressed with the easy starting and excellent power. Last Memorial Day weekend in Salem, I launched Bob Duncan's AT .36 powered "Imitation" several times. That's a really big airplane for a .36, but it hauled it very well, and always after a 1 flip start. It seems to me that he flew it in both Profile and Advanced, but I could be wrong on that. I'm pretty sure I launched it more than a couple of flights and always 1 flip starts. [font=Verdana]I can't imagine a sweeter combination than a G-Nobler and an AT .36.  Steve  [/font]

[/color]

Right you are Steve...

My 36 oz AT powered G. Nobler...Sweet Stuff!

Randy Cuberly

[Paul Taylor]

Guys,
Thanks for the replies.

The original question states that I already owned the engines. Please give opinions along that context. Thanks.

Sorry Guy if you did not get my drift.
John Simpson uses the AT 36 exclusively and has won the Nats as well as other contest with that engine.
I personally have no experience with it other then seeing them in action.
If you have both and not worried about price then try them both and you tell us.

Again IMHO it is like comparing a Chevy to a Toyota. Chevy's are cheap and dependable. Toyota the same but cost a little more but you get more mileage out of a Toyota. (Your mileage might vary)

I have yet to wear out a LA engine so that again may tell you what I know.

If Money was not concern I would buy a AT.

Because you have both can you weigh them and provide the results?

[Alan Buck]

aero-tiger  over the la46 anyday