stunthanger.com
News:
 
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. May 25, 2013, 01:21:50 PM


Login with username, password and session length



Advertise Here
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Jumbo Survey  (Read 1888 times)
builditright
Trade Count: (0)
Captain
*****

Rate User 82
Offline Offline

Posts: 895


Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.


WWW
« on: May 03, 2012, 06:24:17 PM »

okay guys, I got in touch with Carl Risteen the designer of the Jumbo and he
has given me the green light to make a kit if anyone is interested.

If you are looking for a really big Classic model with flaps here's your chance.

The Jumbo was featured in M.A.N. back in 4/56

This is a really big model for a .49-.60
with a 63.75" wingspan
AutoCAD is showing the area to be 963.38 sq.

Would anyone be interested in this one as a kit


* Jumbo0001a.JPG (191.23 KB, 2200x788 - viewed 250 times.)
Logged

Thank you and God Bless
Walter
aka/ builditright
visit us on the web at: http://www.builtrightflyright.com
wwwarbird
Trade Count: (0)
Admiral
******

Rate User 12
Offline Offline

Age: 49
Location: Albert Lea, MN
Posts: 3452


Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.


« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2012, 10:19:17 PM »

 WOW, Jumbo ain't kidding! Cool plane, would be a fun one to do. I could see one with a big Saito on the nose.

 Too many on "The List" and already in inventory for me right now though.
Logged

Narrowly averting disaster since 1964!     Real model airplanes drip oil!

Wayne Willey
Albert Lea, MN U.S.A.
AMA #776548
john e. holliday
2013 Supporter
Trade Count: (0)
Admiral
*

Rate User 17
Offline Offline

Age: 71
Location: Shawnee, KANSAS 66203-2379
Posts: 12053



« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2012, 08:06:26 AM »

I have one scratch built hanging on the hook.  Fox .45 for power.   Flying on .018 X 65 foot lines puts me at the limit.   As long as I am doing manuevering of anykind it is okay.  But, if you fly level for more than a lap or two it disappears from flexing.  Is covered with Super Coverite on the wings.  Double layer of carbon veil on the flaps.   I am using an APC 13-3 prop trying to slow it down.   If I can keep it over 5.3 laps or more it is okay also.   Not enough tank for a complete pattern.   By the way it is big.  Lonestar sent me two blocks for the fuselage that felt like soft pine, but were hard balsa.   It was perfect for the job.  Have not done a total weight on the thing.   Guess I will have to pull it off the hook and weigh it.  No more Jumbo's for me, as they take up too much room. Hugh
Logged

We never really grow up, we only learn how to act in public.

We are never too old to learn something stupid.


John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530
rustler
Trade Count: (0)
Captain
*****

Rate User 6
Offline Offline

Posts: 565


« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2012, 01:24:01 PM »

Quote from: builditright
Would anyone be interested in this one as a kit

Possibly. What sort of fus. construction do you envisage?
Logged

Ian Russell.
[I can remember the schedule o.k., the problem is remembering what was the last manoeuvre I just flew!].
builditright
Trade Count: (0)
Captain
*****

Rate User 82
Offline Offline

Posts: 895


Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.


WWW
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2012, 04:28:33 PM »

Possibly. What sort of fus. construction do you envisage?

I am trying to make it like a normal box built fuse with some triangle stock internally to
allow for the more rounded shape fuselage.
 
« Last Edit: May 04, 2012, 06:02:36 PM by builditright » Logged

Thank you and God Bless
Walter
aka/ builditright
visit us on the web at: http://www.builtrightflyright.com
rustler
Trade Count: (0)
Captain
*****

Rate User 6
Offline Offline

Posts: 565


« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2012, 01:17:20 PM »

Quote from: builditright
I am trying to make it like a normal box built fuse with some triangle stock internally to allow for the more rounded shape fuselage.

Sounds promising. (Only thing is, after a ruthless clearout things are beginning to pile up again!).
I'll keep an eye on this thread.
Logged

Ian Russell.
[I can remember the schedule o.k., the problem is remembering what was the last manoeuvre I just flew!].
builditright
Trade Count: (0)
Captain
*****

Rate User 82
Offline Offline

Posts: 895


Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.


WWW
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2012, 08:41:51 PM »

Let's show a little progress on the Jumbo drawings...   


* TheFuse-Tail.jpg (16.92 KB, 448x231 - viewed 133 times.)

* TheWing.jpg (29.43 KB, 409x336 - viewed 131 times.)
Logged

Thank you and God Bless
Walter
aka/ builditright
visit us on the web at: http://www.builtrightflyright.com
john e. holliday
2013 Supporter
Trade Count: (0)
Admiral
*

Rate User 17
Offline Offline

Age: 71
Location: Shawnee, KANSAS 66203-2379
Posts: 12053



« Reply #7 on: May 07, 2012, 09:02:25 AM »

Can't really tell about the construction on the fuse drawing.   Myself I used two blocks of balsa for the fuse.   Yes a lot of carving and sanding, but everything was on the zero incidence when I got done. Hoff
Logged

We never really grow up, we only learn how to act in public.

We are never too old to learn something stupid.


John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530
Dennis Adamisin
Trade Count: (0)
Admiral
******

Rate User 4
Offline Offline

Age: 58
Posts: 3255


« Reply #8 on: May 07, 2012, 05:17:48 PM »

Can't really tell about the construction on the fuse drawing.   Myself I used two blocks of balsa for the fuse.   Yes a lot of carving and sanding, but everything was on the zero incidence when I got done. Hoff

Doc:
That brought a whole new meaning to the idea of "LOGging In"!  With all that carving, you must have been releasing a lot of internal stresses in the blocks - did you have any trouble with it warping?

I'm afraid I am NOT old school enough to carve/hollow a 3" x 36" hollow log fuselage!   Bow Bow Bow 
Logged

Denny Adamisin
Fort Wayne, IN

"diagonally parked in a parallel universe"
builditright
Trade Count: (0)
Captain
*****

Rate User 82
Offline Offline

Posts: 895


Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.


WWW
« Reply #9 on: May 07, 2012, 09:57:22 PM »

This a little better to see?



* TheFuse-Tail-2a.jpg (83.19 KB, 930x559 - viewed 109 times.)
Logged

Thank you and God Bless
Walter
aka/ builditright
visit us on the web at: http://www.builtrightflyright.com
Jim Rhoades
Trade Count: (0)
Lieutenant
***

Rate User 0
Offline Offline

Age: 74
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 79


« Reply #10 on: May 12, 2012, 03:24:39 PM »

     I too, have thought about building the Jumbo and also talked to Carl Risteen some years ago about it.  I wish it were OTS legal rather than Classic as there are too many much more modern ships out there.  Some of my thoughts on the construction are as follows.  The fuselage is symmetrical for the most part and would lend itself to being molded.  The same mold buck would suffice for the top and bottom.  With the light free flight style multi spar wing construction the covering must be rigid, no plastic films.  Silkspan or polyspan preferred.  I would build up the flaps as a sheeted truss envelope rather than a flat open bay truss.  Being as big as they are I'd cover them with carbon veil for stiffness.  Same for the stab and elevator.

     I think it is a really neat and unique design and would be a fun ship to fly but it would be an awful lot of work and balsa for a sport plane.  I'll stick to the more modern classic ships as the competition I fly against is pretty stiff and I don't build enough to make a project this big for fun.  Don't get me wrong, I think the Jumbo could be made to fly quite well.  I'd be sure to make the controls adjstable as the huge flaps may not need to have much movement.  A large bellcrank and tall horns would seem to be very desireable.  I'd like to say I'd be interested but realisticly I think not.

Jim Rhoades

Looking closer I note that the flaps as you show them are sheeted rather than open bay.
Logged
builditright
Trade Count: (0)
Captain
*****

Rate User 82
Offline Offline

Posts: 895


Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.


WWW
« Reply #11 on: May 15, 2012, 08:59:19 PM »

I am not saying the Jumbo would not be a nice flying or even a competitive stunter
but one thing I think is being overlooked is that Carl has made it clear to me that the
Jumbo was designed for doing tricks. The kind of stuff that is being done with Bi-Slobs.

Now with stiffer flaps and a modern control system
I think the Jumbo would make a really good larger classic stunter.
Logged

Thank you and God Bless
Walter
aka/ builditright
visit us on the web at: http://www.builtrightflyright.com
dennis lipsett
Trade Count: (0)
Admiral
******

Rate User 15
Online Online

Age: 68
Posts: 984


« Reply #12 on: May 15, 2012, 09:19:27 PM »

I don't know Walt, Given the short lifespan of many Bi Slobs doing tricks I'd hate to build a Jumbo for the same return as a Bi Slob. Cost wise it wouldn't work out.
Still it really would look neat in a hover as long as it isn't followed with a tail slide.  LOL

Dennis
Logged
Ty Marcucci
2012 Supporter
Trade Count: (0)
Admiral
*

Rate User 51
Online Online

Age: 72
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 6353



« Reply #13 on: May 16, 2012, 08:53:14 AM »

Personally I'd rename it "the balsa overcast". I've alwsays wanted to build one just to hang on the wall if nothing else.  I have carved a very accurate fuselage for my 1949 "Fireball", but I left the interior smooth, so carving a round fuselage is a no brainer. Just sharp #6 blades, and lots of sand paper...  Hoff
Logged

Ty Marcucci
Dennis Adamisin
Trade Count: (0)
Admiral
******

Rate User 4
Offline Offline

Age: 58
Posts: 3255


« Reply #14 on: May 16, 2012, 01:53:37 PM »

Enough of my hemmin & hawin - I'M IN.  No sense letting Doc have all the fun with the Jumbo!  Will figure out how to build it with plug-in wings so I can carry it in the econobox.  Fuselage with the stab removed would be quite small.

Hey Ty, mine will be "mylar overcast".  There is remarkably little balsa in this thing considering it is almost 1000 squares!  Monocote will stiffen it nicely and make it easier to correct te inevitable wing twists.  Electric power will help make sure it does not wind up in the wind - hopefully preventing the wing flutter Doc talked about.

YEEE HAW!
Logged

Denny Adamisin
Fort Wayne, IN

"diagonally parked in a parallel universe"
gordon tarbell
Trade Count: (0)
Commander
****

Rate User 4
Offline Offline

Age: 56
Posts: 377


« Reply #15 on: May 16, 2012, 06:51:27 PM »

Really good engine for this would be?  The oldest big engine I have is a fresh V60 supertigre. Or do I need to find an old Mc coy 60  or some type of sparker engine. How critical is engine weight on this airframe, and fuel capacity.
Logged

Gordon Tarbell AMA 15019
Dennis Adamisin
Trade Count: (0)
Admiral
******

Rate User 4
Offline Offline

Age: 58
Posts: 3255


« Reply #16 on: May 16, 2012, 07:56:02 PM »

Hi Gordon
Despite its size the Jumbo does not looks like a real power hungry airframe.  Note Doc Holliday said he used a Fox 45 and was "propping down" to try to slow down the airspeed.  The original plans call out a McCoy 60 - I cannot imagine it.

I think Walter's plan shows a Tiger 51, that is probably a reasonable choice, your V-60 is likely stronger but you should be able to use a 5" or 4" pitch prop to check the speed build-up.

Better still if you find the 60 is too much choke the venturi way down to curb the power - and increase your fuel economy.
Logged

Denny Adamisin
Fort Wayne, IN

"diagonally parked in a parallel universe"
john e. holliday
2013 Supporter
Trade Count: (0)
Admiral
*

Rate User 17
Offline Offline

Age: 71
Location: Shawnee, KANSAS 66203-2379
Posts: 12053



« Reply #17 on: August 15, 2012, 08:54:20 AM »

Well the original was flown on 100  foot lines according to the article and the power was a McCoy Redhead 60.   By the way Dennis the carved blocks have not warped and neither has any of the rest of the plane.  Fuel tank area is not big enough to fly full AMA pattern.   But, the plane is an attention getter.   With electric I would imagine putting the battery in the wing and the other stuff in the fuel tank area.  May take it to Topeka for the Ringmaster Marathon in Oct.   Just need to limber up the old IC engine.
Logged

We never really grow up, we only learn how to act in public.

We are never too old to learn something stupid.


John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530
Tags:
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM